# Navigating Discharge From Early Intervention in Psychosis Services: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Service Users and Carers

## TL;DR

This study explores the experiences of people with psychosis and their carers when leaving early intervention services and transitioning to other mental health care.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel qualitative exploration of discharge experiences and highlights the need for improved transitional support and collaboration.

## Key findings

- Service users and carers desire active involvement in discharge planning and report feelings of abandonment post-discharge.
- Carers often act as patient advocates but rarely receive support themselves.
- Improved collaboration and proactive contact from primary care are recommended to support post-discharge transitions.

## Abstract

Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services in England offer up to 3 years' time‐limited support to people experiencing early psychosis. Service users (SUs) are discharged to primary care, a community mental health team (CMHT), or other specialist mental health service. The aim of this study is to explore the SU and carer journey through discharge from EIP and into the early post‐discharge period.

Qualitative longitudinal study comprising semi‐structured interviews with SUs and carers at, or shortly after, discharge from EIP, and follow‐up interviews with SUs 6‐11 months later. Data collection conducted between January 2023–September 2024 and informed by information power. Data were thematically analysed by a multidisciplinary team.

SUs and carers expressed their desire to be actively involved in EIP discharge planning and decision‐making. They contrasted close relationships with EIP practitioners with inaccessibility of care and difficulties navigating healthcare systems after discharge. Some SUs described feelings of abandonment and expressed a wish for transitional support, and proactive, relationship‐based care post‐discharge. Carers played an important role as patient advocates but were rarely offered support themselves.

Improved collaboration is needed between SUs, carers and primary care/CMHT practitioners in the build‐up to EIP discharge. There should be proactive contact from primary care at the point of discharge and in the early post‐discharge period. Carer needs are often overlooked; primary care could utilise the ‘carers register’ and proactively offer support.

Patient and carer involvement and engagement was key to all stages of this study. The research team met regularly with our two co‐investigators with lived experience (as a service user and a carer), who contributed to data analysis and writing this paper. We worked closely with our patient and carer advisory group, EXTEND‐ing, throughout the research process. They helped formulate research questions, co‐designed topic guides and participant information sheets, and contributed to data analysis and interpretation.