Neonatal Anemia in Preterm Infants: Are We Overtransfusing?
Pravati Jena, Rojalin Rout, Rama K Gudu, Deepti D Pradhan, Santosh K Panda

TL;DR
This study examines whether preterm infants are being overtransfused with blood, finding that transfusions often exceed recommended thresholds for stable infants.
Contribution
The study identifies liberal transfusion practices in stable preterm infants, suggesting potential for policy improvement to avoid over-transfusion.
Findings
Most transfusions were given at three or more weeks of age for late anemia.
Transfusions for stable infants often exceeded recommended hemoglobin thresholds.
Transfusion practices aligned with some guidelines but showed room for improvement.
Abstract
Aims and objectives: The purpose of this study was to ascertain the appropriate packed red blood cell transfusion (PRBCT) practice for preterm infants consistent with multiple international guidelines. Method: This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center in India from February 2019 to December 2020. All preterm neonates born at <32 weeks of gestation who received PRBCTs during the study period were included. The hemoglobin (Hb) levels at the time of transfusion were analyzed to assess adherence to the transfusion thresholds recommended by the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH), Canadian Blood Services (CBS), and the Australian National Blood Authority (ANBA), considering postnatal age and the need for respiratory support. Results: A total of 43 preterm neonates (gestational age, 28.08±1.08 weeks; birth weight, 1,018±0.027 g) received 78 PRBCTs.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Guideline | Category | Hb (g/dl) threshold | Timeline |
| BCSH | Neonates with MV | <12 | 24 hours |
| <12 | 1 week | ||
| <10 | 2 weeks | ||
| <10 | ≥ 3 weeks | ||
| Neonates with NIV/O2 | <12 | 24 hours | |
| <10 | 1 week | ||
| <9.5 | 2 weeks | ||
| <8.5 | ≥ 3 weeks | ||
| Neonates without O2 | <10 | 24 hours | |
| <10 | 1 week | ||
| <7.5 | 2 weeks | ||
| <7.5 | ≥3 weeks | ||
| ANBA | Neonates with respiratory support (MV/CPAP/high-flow/O2) | 11-13 | 1 week |
| 10-12.5 | 2 weeks | ||
| 8.5-11 | ≥3 weeks | ||
| Neonates without respiratory support | 10-12 | 1 week | |
| 8.5-11 | 2 weeks | ||
| 7-10 | ≥3 weeks | ||
| CBS | Neonates with respiratory support | <11.5 | 1 week |
| <10 | 2 weeks | ||
| <8.5 | ≥3 weeks | ||
| Neonates without respiratory support | 10 | 1 week | |
| 8.5 | 2 weeks | ||
| 7.5 | ≥3 weeks |
| Neonatal characteristics | Frequency (%) and mean (SD) |
| Gestational age (weeks)# | 28.08 (1.08) |
| Birth weight (grams)# | 1018 (0.027) |
| Gender (male) | 28 (65.2%) |
| Gender (female) | 15 (34.8%) |
| Mode of delivery (caesarean) | 16 (37.2%) |
| Number of ELBW | 21 (49%) |
| Age of neonates during transfusion | Frequency (%) |
| Transfusions received during the first week | 9 (11.5%) |
| Transfusions received during the second week | 14 (18%) |
| Transfusions received ≥ 3 weeks | 55 (70.5%) |
| Need for respiratory support during transfusion | Frequency (%) |
| Transfusion during mechanical ventilation | 9 (11.5%) |
| Transfusion during non-invasive ventilation and O₂ support | 49 (63%) |
| Transfusion without O₂ support | 20 (25.5%) |
| Postnatal PRBCT (n=78) | BCSH | ANBA | CBS | ||||
| a/b (%) | MV (n=9) | NIPPV, O2 (n=49) | No O2 (n=20) | Respiratory support* (n=58) | No respiratory support (n=20) | Respiratory support* (n=58) | No respiratory support (n=20) |
| 1st week (n=9) | 7/7 (100%) | 2/2 (100%) | - | 9/9 (100%) | - | 9/9 (100%) | - |
| 2nd week (n=14) | 1/1 (100%) | 12/13 (92.3%) | - | 14/14 (100%) | - | 14/14 (100%) | - |
| ≥ 3rd week (n=55) | 1/1 (100%) | 34/34 (100%) | 6/20 (30%) | 35/35 (100%) | 20/20 (100%) | 35/35 (100%) | 0/20 (0%) |
| Overall | 9/9 (100%) | 48/49 (98%) | 6/20 (30%) | 58/58 (100%) | 20/20 (100%) | 58/58 (100%) | 0/20 (0%) |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeonatal Health and Biochemistry · Blood transfusion and management · Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Introduction
Preterm neonates are at increased risk for anemia, and packed red blood cell transfusion (PRBCT) is a common therapeutic intervention for the management of this condition [1]. Low gestational age, low birth weight, and the presence of cardio-respiratory morbidity in preterm infants increase the need for PRBCTs. Transfusions increase oxygen (O₂) delivery to tissues, help manage hypoxemia and apnea, and promote weight gain, but they simultaneously increase the risk of multiple complications.
Hemoglobin (Hb) is the most common indicator for PRBCT. The decision to transfuse is primarily based on Hb thresholds, which vary according to the severity of respiratory complications. There is wide variation in the recommended threshold across neonatal units worldwide [2]. Most neonatal units adopt one of the international guidelines, namely the Canadian Blood Services (CBS), the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH), or the Australian National Blood Authority (ANBA). All guidelines recommend the Hb threshold for PRBCT based on chronological age and the need for respiratory support [3-5]. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether our PRBCT practice for preterm infants was consistent with these global transfusion guidelines.
Materials and methods
This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary center in eastern India from February 2019 to December 2020 with permission from the Institutional Ethics Committee, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (Bhubaneswar, OR, IND). Because of the study design, individual patient consent was not obtained. All preterm neonates under 32 weeks who received PRBCTs in the neonatal intensive care unit during the study period were included. Neonates receiving transfusions during surgical procedures, in the immediate postoperative period, or undergoing repeated transfusions within 24 hours were excluded, as transfusion decisions in these contexts are often driven by acute clinical indications rather than standard guideline thresholds.
We entered the detailed demographic characteristics of the enrolled neonates and the data associated with each transfusion episode in a predefined pro forma. These characteristics and data included the Hb level (g/dl) prior to transfusion, chronological age (week of age), and the type of respiratory support, whether mechanical ventilation (MV), non-invasive ventilation (NIV) such as noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), high flow, or with or without O₂ therapy during the PRBCT. The suggested Hb (g/dl) threshold for PRBCTs under the BCSH, ANBA, and CBS guidelines is listed in Table 1. Note: In certain clinical situations, the Hb threshold may increase to 8.5 g/dl for neonates without O2 under the BCSH guidelines.
Assuming a 30% prevalence of inappropriate PRBC transfusions based on a previous study [6] and using a 10% margin of error at a 95% confidence level, the estimated sample size was 81. Our audit included 78 transfusion episodes, which is close to the calculated requirement and offers adequate power for descriptive analysis. In the analysis of the data, the average of the quantitative variables was expressed as the mean (SD), and the qualitative variable was expressed as the frequency (%). The primary outcome was the appropriateness of the PRBCTs according to the various international transfusion guidelines expressed as a proportion. The descriptive statistics for the data analysis were calculated using the DATAtab statistical calculator (DATAtab Seiersberg, STE, AUT).
Results
During the study period, 43 (29%) of the 148 admitted preterm neonates received a total of 78 PRBCTs. The mean gestational age and birth weight of these neonates were 28.08±1.08 weeks and 1018±0.027 g, respectively. Of these neonates, 28 (65.2%) were male, 16 (37.2%) were delivered by cesarean, and 21 (49%) were of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) (Table 2).
A total of 22 (51.2%) neonates received a single PRBCT, 14 (30.7%) neonates received two PBRCTs, and seven (16.1%) neonates received three or more PRBCTs. A total of 21 (80.7%) of 26 ELBW neonates (birth weight <1000 g) and 22 (18%) of 122 very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates (1000-1500 g) received PRBCTs during their hospital stays.
The proportion of transfusions received during the first week, second week, and subsequent weeks after the birth of the neonates was nine (11.5%), 14 (18%), and 55 (70.5%), respectively. Of 78 transfusion episodes, nine (11.5%) were administered during MV, 49 (63%) during NIV and O₂ support, and 20 (25.5%) without O₂ support (Table 3). Of the 20 neonates transfused PRBCs without O₂, 14 (70%) were asymptomatic and at risk of loss to follow-up, one (5%) continued to fail to thrive, three (15%) had isolated tachycardia, and two (10%) had recurrent apnea. Six of the above clinical scenarios were resolved with PRBCTs.
All of the neonates received PRBCTs during MV in a manner consistent with the CBS, BCSH, and ANBA transfusion guidelines. Of the PBRCTs that were given to the neonates receiving NIV or O₂ support, 48/49 (98%) followed the BCSH guidelines, and all 49 (100%) followed both the CBS and ANBA guidelines. Of the transfusions without O₂ support, six (30%) were consistent with the BCSH guidelines, none followed the CBS guidelines, and all were consistent with the ANBA guidelines (Table 4). Overall, the PRBCTs were consistent with the BCSH, CBS, and ANBA guidelines in 63/78 (80.7%), 58/78 (74.3%), and 100% of the cases, respectively.
Discussion
This is the first monocentric study from a low- to middle-income country designed to report whether the PRBCT practice for preterm infants is consistent with various international guidelines. The neonates with severe to moderate respiratory impairment received PRBCTs in a manner consistent with the ANBA, BCSH, and CBS guidelines, whereas most stable preterm infants with late anemia received PRBCTs liberally, consistent with the CBS and BCSH guidelines.
The need for PRBCTs among the ELBW and VLBW neonates in our study was similar to that in many previous studies [7,8]. The landmark Premature Infant in Need of Transfusion (PINT) trial [9] and the findings of Chen et al. [10] have convinced neonatologists to transfuse at lower Hb thresholds by indicating a lesser requirement for PRBCTs without compromising any neonatal morbidities, i.e., severe intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, or chronic lung disease. Subsequently, the Transfusion of Premature (TOP) trial [11] and the Effects of Transfusion Thresholds on Neurocognitive Outcomes of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants (ETTNO) group [12] found no reduction in death or disability with liberal PRBCTs and advocated for restrictive strategies. The fact that the Hb threshold suggested by the BCSH and the CBS is consistent with the restrictive PRBCT strategy, whereas the Hb threshold remained in the range of the restrictive to liberal Hb cut-off in the ANBA guidelines, explains the greater consistency of our PRBCT practice with the ANBA guidelines [9].
Packed red blood cell transfusions in moderate-to-severe cardiorespiratory cases in preterm infants can be lifesaving, and transfusions in stable preterm infants are required in the context of anemia of prematurity with failure to thrive, heart failure, and tissue hypoxia. Considering the dropout in the post-discharge follow-up, the lack of serial Hb estimation, and the home monitoring of clinical signs and symptoms of severe anemia similar to the situation in most low- and middle-income countries, we conducted PRBCTs liberally in stable preterm infants after one-on-one parental discussions. By contrast, an Indian study found that 30% of the PRBCTs in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were inconsistent with the BCSH guidelines, though most involved sick neonates [6].
We acknowledge that this study is subject to significant limitations. First, the data were analyzed retrospectively and from a single center, and the sample size was small. Second, we routinely evaluated the reticulocyte percentage as a marker of erythropoiesis, coupled with the Hb level, for anemia screening among growing preterm infants; however, the usefulness of this practice is beyond the scope of this study. Again, the short- and long-term outcomes of neonates who received liberal transfusions have not been reported.
Conclusions
We observed that many stable preterm neonates were transfused liberally with PRBCs in our clinical practice compared with the internationally published guidelines. This discrepancy raises concerns about adherence to best practices and the potential adverse effects for preterm infants. Further investigation into the criteria for transfusion in this population is necessary to align clinical practice with established guidelines. Hence, this study highlights the importance of transfusion audits in neonatal units and provides a basis for future quality improvement measures in PRBCT strategy, considering Hb or hematocrit threshold and reticulocyte count parameters to avoid over-transfusion in stable preterm neonates.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Packed red blood cell transfusion in preterm infants Lancet Haematol Bellach L Eigenschink M Hassanein A 6156269202210.1016/S 2352-3026(22)00207-135901846 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2International survey of transfusion practices for extremely premature infants Semin Perinatol Guillén U Cummings JJ Bell EF 2442473620122281854410.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.004PMC 3579510 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Guidelines on transfusion for fetuses, neonates and older children Br J Haematol New HV Berryman J Bolton-Maggs PH 78482817520162786173410.1111/bjh.14233 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Chapter 13: neonatal and paediatrics transfusion Canadian Blood Services, Clinical Guide to Transfusion Lau W 2017 https://professionaleducation.blood.ca/en/transfusion/clinical-guide/neonatal-and-pediatric-transfusion
- 5Module 6 Neonatal and Paediatrics: Patient Blood Management Guidelines Australian National Blood Authority: Patient blood management guidelines: module 6 neonatal and paediatrics 2016 https://www.blood.gov.au/module-6-neonatal-and-paediatrics-patient-blood-management-guidelines
- 6Blood component transfusion in a tertiary care hospital Indian J Pediatr Sharif M Saxena A Singh S Manchala S Jafri N 3393448720203216214610.1007/s 12098-020-03186-2PMC 7223979 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Temporal changes in blood product usage in preterm neonates born at less than 30 weeks' gestation in Canada Transfusion Keir AK Yang J Harrison A Pelausa E Shah PS 134013465520152565274010.1111/trf.12998 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Effects of red blood cell transfusions on the risk of developing complications or death: an observational study of a cohort of very low birth weight infants Am J Perinatol Ghirardello S Dusi E Cortinovis I 88953420172724979710.1055/s-0036-1584300 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
