# Eight-Year Survival Analysis of Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Does Treatment Era Affect Prognosis?

**Authors:** Lukas Kucera, Martin Chudý, Marcela Danková, Eva Goncalvesová

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.87586 · Cureus · 2025-07-09

## TL;DR

This study analyzed eight-year survival in dilated cardiomyopathy patients and found no significant difference in survival between treatment eras, despite a higher-risk profile in recent years.

## Contribution

The study provides a long-term survival analysis of DCM patients and identifies clinical factors affecting prognosis.

## Key findings

- Mean overall survival for DCM patients was 84.1 months with no significant difference between 2016-2019 and 2020-2023 cohorts.
- Patients diagnosed in 2020-2023 had a higher-risk profile, including more advanced heart failure and larger ventricular diameters.
- Older age, advanced heart failure, CKD, diabetes, and high NT-proBNP were negative predictors of survival.

## Abstract

Background

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of heart failure (HF). We retrospectively analyzed long-term survival in DCM and the impact of clinical factors on their prognosis.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 622 DCM patients (484 men, 138 women). Survival was compared between the 2016-2019 and 2020-2023 cohorts.

Results

The mean age was similar between cohorts (54 ± 13 vs. 55 ± 13 years). Mean overall survival for the entire cohort was 84.1 ± 1.6 months (95% CI: 81.0-87.4). When analyzed by period, mean survival was 84.1 ± 2.0 months (95% CI: 80.3-87.9) for patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019 and 53.4 ± 1.1 months (95% CI: 51.2-55.6) for those diagnosed between 2020 and 2023. The difference was not statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.856). The shorter mean survival in the later period reflects the limited follow-up time due to ongoing observation.

In the 2020-2023 group, a higher proportion of patients were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) III/IV (56% vs. 48%, p = 0.036) and had larger ventricular diameters (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD): 68 ± 8 mm vs. 66 ± 7 mm, p = 0.001; right ventricle (RV): 36 ± 7 mm vs. 34 ± 6 mm, p = 0.001). Treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) did not significantly affect survival. Multivariable analysis identified older age, NYHA class III/IV, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5, diabetes, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) >3000 ng/L as independent negative predictors, while female sex and overweight status were associated with better survival. Multivariable analysis identified older age, NYHA III/IV, CKD stages 3-5, diabetes, and NT-proBNP >3000 ng/L as independent negative predictors. Female sex and overweight status were associated with improved survival.

Conclusions

Survival in DCM patients remained stable across time periods, despite a higher-risk profile in recent years, potentially influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** Dilated cardiomyopathy (MONDO:0005021), heart failure (MONDO:0005252), chronic kidney disease (MONDO:0005300), diabetes (MONDO:0005015)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** SLC5A2 (solute carrier family 5 member 2) [NCBI Gene 6524] {aka SGLT2}
- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), diabetes (MESH:D003920), CKD (MESH:D051436), HF (MESH:D006333), overweight (MESH:D050177), DCM (MESH:D002311)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12334973/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12334973/full.md

## References

28 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12334973/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12334973