# Metabarcoding provides accurate estimation of volumetric diet composition in a top predator despite interference from blocking primers

**Authors:** Jabi Zabala, Pablo Acebes, María J. Madeira, Efrén Fernández, Benjamín Juan Gómez-Moliner, Xabier Cabodevilla

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-14837-9 · Scientific Reports · 2025-08-08

## TL;DR

This study shows that metabarcoding can accurately estimate the diet of wolves, even when using blocking primers, though some challenges remain.

## Contribution

The study demonstrates the accuracy of metabarcoding for diet estimation in wolves despite blocking primer interference.

## Key findings

- Relative read abundance accurately reflected dietary composition with an R2 of 0.815.
- Blocking primers increased false detections and reduced accuracy of diet estimates.
- Sample sizes over 30 scats improved diet estimation accuracy.

## Abstract

The study of diet is central to wildlife ecology, management and conservation. Metabarcoding enhanced the ability to identify species contributing to wildlife diets, and blocking primers can maximize prey detection. Relative read abundance (RRA) of different prey species has been used as semi-quantitative approach, assuming that RRA reflects species’ contributions to diet. We tested accuracy of RRA in diet estimation by feeding captive wolves six different diets. We analyzed samples both without and with four blocking primer concentrations (5, 10, 15 and 20×). RRA provided a highly accurate representation of the overall dietary composition, with best results obtained without blocking primer (0.775 ± 0.033; P < 0.001; R2 = 0.815). While the use of blocking the primer resulted in higher proportions of reads for diet items it did not increase the probability of detecting diet components. Moreover, the blocking primer led to increased detections of items not fed to wolves and produced slightly less accurate estimates of diet composition. Resampling indicated that sample sizes beyond 30 scats improved the accuracy of diet estimation. Our results are promising and support the use of metabarcoding to determine volumetric diet but caution and further research are necessary before extrapolating findings.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-14837-9.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fatty (MESH:D008067)
- **Chemicals:** S (MESH:D013455), ethanol (MESH:D000431), water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Equus caballus (domestic horse, species) [taxon 9796], Sus scrofa domesticus (domestic pig, subspecies) [taxon 9825], Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Meleagris gallopavo (common turkey, species) [taxon 9103], Capreolus capreolus (Western roe deer, species) [taxon 9858], Ovis aries (domestic sheep, species) [taxon 9940], Canis lupus signatus (Iberian wolf, subspecies) [taxon 425934], Cervus elaphus (red deer, species) [taxon 9860], Oryctolagus cuniculus (domestic rabbit, species) [taxon 9986], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031], Sus scrofa (pig, species) [taxon 9823], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Nyctereutes procyonoides (raccoon dog, species) [taxon 34880]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12334639/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12334639/full.md

## References

8 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12334639/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12334639