# Association between radiographic equine distal phalanx characteristics and absence, presence and type of horseshoes

## TL;DR

This study examines how different horseshoe clips affect the shape and density of horse hooves, finding that dorsoabaxial clips are linked to narrower hoof shapes.

## Contribution

The study identifies specific correlations between horseshoe clip types and distal phalanx morphology in equids.

## Key findings

- Hooves shod with dorsoabaxial clips had a significantly lower width to length ratio compared to those with a single dorsal clip.
- Unshod hooves showed no significant difference in width to length ratio compared to both shod groups.
- The study highlights the importance of shoeing type in influencing hoof shape and density.

## Abstract

Most horses are used with horseshoes additionally supported by either dorsoabaxial or dorsal clips. The effects of such clips on bone density and shape of the distal phalanx are currently unclear. The aim of this study was to identify correlations between density and shape of the distal phalanx, comparing front hooves unshod or shod with standard shoes either with two dorsoabaxial clips or with a single dorsal clip. Researchers analyzed Oxspring radiographs of either the left or right front hoof from warmblood horses (n = 132) and ponies (n = 43) aged 3–28 years. The evaluation focused on distal phalanx density at the margo solearis, particularly at three locations corresponding to the clip positions: dorsomedial, dorsal, and dorsolateral. The study examined horse related variables such as age, breed, use, and shoeing type in relation to density parameters, presence of a crena marginalis solearis, an anatomical variation that is an indentation dorsal on the margo solearis, and the shape of the distal phalanx. Distal phalanges of hooves shod with dorsoabaxial clips showed a significantly (p < 0.001) lower width to length ratio (median 1.31, minimum 0.70, maximum 1.66) compared to those with a single dorsal clip (median 1.40, minimum 0.89, maximum 1.75). The width to length ratio of unshod hooves (median 1.37, minimum 0.80, maximum 1.82) was not significantly different from both groups of shod hooves. The results of this study should be considered when selecting horseshoes for equids.