Correction to “Evaluation of the Antiwear‐Ability/Scratch‐Resistance Efficacy of Makeup Products by In Vitro Test Method Application”
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConsumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior · Textile materials and evaluations
Jiang Y, Xu Z, Qiu Y, Chen G, Wang S. Evaluation of the antiwear‐ability/scratch‐resistance efficacy of makeup products by in vitro test method application. Skin Res Technol. 2023;29:e13420. doi:10.1111/srt.13420
In the article, there were errors in References 5 to 11.
The incorrect references are:
-
Williams LN, Coles LR. Consumer perceptions of Foundation makeup product efficacy. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2019;41(5):416‐424.
-
Xu J, Giddens SE, Sivamani R. Evaluating the performance of liquid Foundation makeup on aging facial skin using a 3D skin imaging system. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(4):1054‐1061.
-
Fukayama K, Ikoma H, Sakai K, et al. Comparison of two in vivo methods for evaluating facial Foundation makeup. J Oleo Sci. 2019;68(1):13‐18.
-
Souza MA, Campos MM, Arruda TP, et al. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of transfer‐resistant properties of Foundation makeup. Skin Res Technol. 2020;26(3):296‐303.
-
Pollitt K, Heusel L, McAtamney R. Development of an in vivo and in vitro method for evaluating the efficacy of long‐wearing Foundation makeup. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2021;43(1):9‐16.
-
Weschler CJ, Worsley C, Nazaroff WW. Using makeup Foundation to assess chemical exposure from air and dust: differences by product type and formulation. Environ Sci Technol. 2019;53(2):763‐771. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05338
-
van der Kolk MM, de Lima Carvalho L, Weijland J, Verboven MD, van der Molen AM. Measuring the amount of moisturizing cream applied on human skin: an ex vivo method. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2016;29(1):19‐25. doi:10.1159/000441984
The correct references are:
-
Yan Y, Lee J, Hong J, et al. Measuring and describing the discoloration of liquid foundation. Color Res Appl, 2020. doi:10.1002/col.22584
-
Keita S, Ikuyo S. Evaluation method of makeup collapse and evaluation model of makeup collapse: JP 2019001738 A[P]. 2019‐01‐10.
-
Jessica A, Joseph B, Mehdi D. Quantitative evaluation for transfer resistance of face foundation products: fast screening (in‐vitro) vs. consumer‐centric (in‐vivo) assessment. Proceedings of the 26th IFSCC Conference “Cosmetic Science that Awakens the Senses”. 2021:2668‐2671.
-
Badami JV, Bui HS Quantification of the color transfer from long‐wear face foundation products: The relevance of wettability. In: Mittal KL, Bui HS, eds. Surface Science and Adhesion in Cosmetics. 2021. doi:10.1002/9781119654926.ch12.
-
ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Scratch Resistance of Polymeric Coatings and Plastics Using an Instrumented Scratch Machine: ASTM D7027‐13 [S]. 2013. doi:10.1520/d7027-13.
-
Robert P. Container e.g. for cosmetic product has scratch‐resistant plastic cover for at least part of outer surface: FR 2799182 A1[P]. 2001‐04‐06.
-
Alam S, Algahtani MS, Ahmad MZ, et al. Investigation utilizing the HLB concept for the development of moisturizing cream and lotion: In‐vitro characterization and stability evaluation. Cosmetics. 2020;7(2):43. doi:10.3390/cosmetics7020043.
We apologize for these errors.