# A Meta-Analysis Comparing Sublay and Onlay Mesh Repair in Incisional Hernia Surgery Based on Surgical Outcomes

**Authors:** Wishal Shaukat, Malik Asfand Yar, Zulfiqar Ali, Tahir Aslam, Saud Hussain, Qamar Yasmeen, Kamran Hyder Abbasi, Mohammad Shiraz

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.87541 · Cureus · 2025-07-08

## TL;DR

This study compares two mesh repair techniques for incisional hernias and finds sublay mesh repair may offer better outcomes despite longer surgery time.

## Contribution

A meta-analysis comparing sublay and onlay mesh repair techniques in incisional hernia surgery based on surgical outcomes.

## Key findings

- Sublay mesh repair was associated with lower hernia recurrence rates.
- Sublay repair showed fewer postoperative complications, including reduced seroma and surgical site infection.
- Hospital stay was shorter with sublay repair, though onlay repair had shorter operative time.

## Abstract

Incisional hernia is a common surgical complication that often requires mesh-based repair. Among the various techniques, sublay (retrorectus) and onlay mesh placements are frequently employed, but their relative effectiveness in terms of surgical outcomes remains debated. This meta-analysis aimed to compare sublay and onlay mesh repair techniques in incisional hernia surgery based on key postoperative outcomes. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar for studies published in English between January 2010 and March 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies directly comparing sublay and onlay mesh repair techniques and reporting on at least one predefined surgical outcome. Six studies involving a total of 468 patients were included in the analysis. Primary outcomes assessed included hernia recurrence, postoperative complications, surgical site infection (SSI), and seroma formation. Secondary outcomes included operative time and length of hospital stay. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model with odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) reported along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The meta-analysis revealed that sublay mesh repair was consistently associated with lower hernia recurrence rates, though the differences did not reach a statistical significance. Sublay repair also demonstrated significantly fewer postoperative complications in multiple studies, particularly in terms of reduced seroma formation and SSI. Furthermore, hospital stay was significantly shorter in the sublay group in two of the three studies reporting this outcome. Onlay repair, however, was associated with a shorter operative time. In conclusion, sublay mesh repair offers superior outcomes in terms of recurrence, complications, seroma, and hospital stay, suggesting it as the preferred approach for incisional hernia repair in appropriate clinical settings.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** hernia (MESH:D006547), Incisional Hernia (MESH:D000069290), infection (MESH:D007239), SSI (MESH:D013530), seroma (MESH:D049291)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12332053/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12332053/full.md

## References

20 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12332053/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12332053