# Economics of vaccination against diarrhoea and respiratory diseases in French cow calves’ systems: A modelling approach

**Authors:** Ahmed Ferchiou, Anthony Giacomini, Nicolas Herman, Guillaume Lhermie, Didier Raboisson, Angel Abuelo, Angel Abuelo, Angel Abuelo, Angel Abuelo

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329325 · PLOS One · 2025-08-06

## TL;DR

This study uses a model to show that vaccinating cow calves against diseases can be economically beneficial, especially in high-risk scenarios.

## Contribution

A new bio-economic model was developed to assess vaccination economics in cow-calf systems under varying disease risks.

## Key findings

- Vaccination reduced diarrhoea and respiratory disease prevalence by 24% and 50%, respectively.
- Return on investment for vaccination was 0.4–0.5 in average risk scenarios and 1 in high-risk scenarios.
- Farmers could earn €58–75 per extra hour of vaccination labor in medium-risk scenarios.

## Abstract

To assess the economic benefits of vaccination against diarrhoea and respiratory diseases in cow-calf systems, a stochastic mechanistic mathematical programming bio-economic model was developed for a beef Charolais breed farm. The model reproduced herd dynamics on a weekly basis over a 10-year period, including animal growth, reproduction and diseases risks and control (treatments and vaccination). Three baseline risk levels of diarrhoea and respiratory disease were considered to simulate low, average, and high infection risks on the farm. The results demonstrated the model’s ability to reproduce average farm dynamics, with diarrhoea prevalence ranging from 8% to 33% and respiratory diseases from 13% to 79%. On average, prevalences were decreased by 24% and 50%, respectively, due to vaccination, which also reduced the 2-day to 1-month mortality rates by 2–3% and 15–17%, respectively. The net value of vaccination was positive except in cases of low infection risk of diarrhoea and respiratory diseases: the return on investment (ROI) of vaccination was 0.4–0.5 (€1 invested yields €0.4–0.5) in the baseline scenario (middle infection risks), negative under low infection risks, and reached 1 (€1 invested yields €1) for high infection risks. The results also showed that farmers may earn €58–75 in additional revenue per extra hour of labour dedicated to vaccination in the medium-risk scenario. Despite the limited availability of data for cow-calf systems, this study demonstrated the economic benefit of vaccination in most combinations of scenarios and risks. The profitability of vaccination was challenged when low disease risks were considered, but in such cases, vaccination may serve as insurance against financial losses in case of health status deterioration.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** diarrhoea (MONDO:0001673)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** infection (MESH:D007239), respiratory disease (MESH:D012140), diarrhoea (MESH:D003967)
- **Species:** Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12327687/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12327687/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12327687/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12327687