# Clinical and diagnostic imaging outcomes of mandibular fracture management in 109 cats

**Authors:** Janny V. Evenhuis, Anna Vincek, Stephanie Goldschmidt, Maria Soltero-Rivera, Mindy A. Nguyen, Boaz Arzi

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1633636 · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025-07-23

## TL;DR

This study examines the treatment outcomes of mandibular fractures in 109 cats, finding that surgical fixation leads to better healing and fewer complications than traditional methods.

## Contribution

The study provides new clinical evidence comparing ORIF and MMF in feline mandibular fracture treatment outcomes.

## Key findings

- Cats treated with ORIF showed significantly better healing outcomes compared to those treated with MMF.
- Persistent malocclusion was less common in cats treated with ORIF than in those treated with MMF.
- Pre-operative fracture displacement was linked to poor healing in specific mandibular regions.

## Abstract

Mandibular injuries are a common occurrence in cats that are presented for maxillofacial trauma. Timely assessment and treatment of these injuries directly impacts a cat’s return to function.

A retrospective study was performed on a population of 109 cats that were presented for evaluation and treatment of mandibular trauma. Medical records and diagnostic imaging were reviewed to determine mandibular fracture location, morphology, and treatment. Follow-up data were obtained from repeat clinical examination and diagnostic imaging.

The most commonly injured anatomical locations were the mandibular symphysis (55.0%), the condylar process of the mandible (49.5%) and mid ramus (48.6%). More severe pre-operative fracture displacement was associated with a poor healing outcome in the mid ramus and coronoid process regions. The group of cats treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) had a significantly higher percentage of cats showing adequate healing (P = 0.0247) compared to the group of cats treated with maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). Cats treated with ORIF also had lower prevalence of persistent malocclusion (9.1%) when compared to cats treated with MMF (53.9%) (P = 0.0138, respectively). Placement of an esophageal feeding tube did not have a statistically significant impact on weight change in patients post-operatively (P = 0.0973). Patient survival was high at 94.5%.

High patient survival indicates that cats that were diagnosed and treated for mandibular trauma often have a good prognosis. Pre-operative fracture displacement may influence healing in select regions of the mandible. Fractures treated with ORIF had a higher rate of adequate bone healing when compared with fractures treated with MMF.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** malocclusion (MESH:D008310), fracture displacement (MESH:D006617), Mandibular injuries (MESH:D008338), maxillofacial trauma (MESH:D008446), Fractures (MESH:D050723), mandibular fracture (MESH:D008337)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12327238/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12327238/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12327238/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12327238