Correction for Canfield et al., “Lytic Bacteriophages Facilitate Antibiotic Sensitization of Enterococcus faecium”
Gregory S. Canfield, Anushila Chatterjee, Juliel Espinosa, Mihnea R. Mangalea, Emma K. Sheriff, Micah Keidan, Sara W. McBride, Bruce D. McCollister, Howard C. Hang, Breck A. Duerkop
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacteriophages and microbial interactions
AUTHOR CORRECTION
Vol. 65, no. 5, e00143-21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00143-21. Page 7, Fig. 5A: “L insertion” should read “F insertion.”
Supplemental material: In Fig. S4A, the BLASTP alignment of SagA between E. faecium Com12 and Com15 was incorrectly denoted as an L insertion between Y451 and L452. In Table S2, the text in the AA change column for 81R6 was incorrectly labeled as “Leu insertion between Tyr451 & Leu452.” The correct text is given in the revised supplemental file in this correction.