# Deep learning based localisation and classification of gamma photon interactions in thick nanocomposite and ceramic monolithic scintillators

## TL;DR

This paper uses deep learning to accurately locate and classify gamma photon interactions in thick scintillator materials used for radiation imaging.

## Contribution

The study introduces deep neural networks for photon interaction classification and localization in nanocomposite and ceramic scintillators, achieving high accuracy.

## Key findings

- The classifier achieved ≥90.1% accuracy for single-energy deposition events.
- Median total localisation error ranged from 0.58 mm to 2.91 mm using CNN and 0.59 mm to 2.10 mm using InceptionNet.
- InceptionNet improved localization in nanocomposites, approaching the accuracy of ceramic scintillators.

## Abstract

Accurate localisation of the first point of interaction (FPoI) of incident gamma photons in monolithic scintillators is crucial for many radiation-based imaging applications - in particular, accurate estimation of the lines of response in positron emission tomography (PET). This is particularly challenging in thick nanocomposite and ceramic scintillator materials, which exhibit high levels of Rayleigh scattering compared to monocrystalline scintillators. In this work, we evaluate deep neural network-based approaches for (1) classifying the mode of photon interaction using an InceptionNet-based classifier and (2) accurately estimating the location of the FPoI based on scintillation photon distributions in several monolithic nanocomposite and ceramic scintillators using both CNN- and InceptionNet-based regression networks. The classifier was able to correctly categorise single-energy deposition events with an accuracy \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document} 90.1%, two-deposition interactions with an accuracy \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document} 77.6% and three-plus deposition interactions with an accuracy \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$\ge$$\end{document} 66.7%. Across the evaluated materials, median total localisation error ranged from 0.58 mm to 2.91 mm with the CNN and 0.59 mm to 2.10 mm with InceptionNet, assuming 50% detector quantum efficiency. Localisation in nanocomposites using the InceptionNet-based regression network improved the most relative to previously-reported results based on classical techniques, in some cases approaching the accuracy achieved with ceramic scintillators.