# Comparative evaluation of spontaneous breathing trial techniques for ventilator weaning: a bench study

**Authors:** Guillaume Fossat, Roberto Martínez Alejos, Emeline Fresnel, Mai-Anh Nay, Clément Medrinal, Marius Lebret

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s40635-025-00788-y · Intensive Care Medicine Experimental · 2025-08-05

## TL;DR

This study compares different methods for testing if ventilated patients can breathe on their own, focusing on breathing effort and CO2 removal.

## Contribution

The study provides a novel bench comparison of humidified high-flow, T-piece, and pressure support SBTs under varied respiratory conditions.

## Key findings

- HHF and T-piece SBTs had similar effects on work of breathing across different effort patterns.
- HHF improved CO2 clearance compared to pressure support during intense effort.
- HHF increased PEEPtot more than T-piece but less than pressure support.

## Abstract

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) are crucial for determining when mechanically ventilated patients are ready for extubation. While pressure support (PS) and T-piece trials are commonly used, humidified high-flow (HHF) is increasingly considered, but its physiological effects remain unclear. This bench study compares T-piece, PS, and HHF modalities, evaluating their impact on work of breathing (WOB), tidal volume (Vt), total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPtot) and CO2 clearance.

A 3D-printed manikin head connected to an artificial lung was used. Four SBT modalities were tested: T-piece with and without supplemental oxygen, PS at 7 cmH2O (PEEP 0 cmH2O), and HHF at 50 L/min. The tests were performed under three lung conditions (normal, obstructive, restrictive) and two respiratory drive and effort settings (normal and intense), resulting in 24 scenarios. Measurements included WOB, CO2 clearance, PEEPtot, and Vt.

T-piece and HHF50 SBTs exhibited similar effects on WOB, irrespective of the effort pattern associated with the underlying respiratory mechanics. For intense effort patterns, the CO2 concentration was lower with HHF than with PS, regardless of respiratory mechanics. The HHF50 SBT increased PEEPtot more than T-piece SBTs, but less than PS SBT, for all scenarios. HHF50 SBT generated lower tidal volume than T-piece and PS SBTs.

Humidified high-flow at 50 L/min, while preserving WOB and not increasing tidal volume, may offer specific advantages, such as improved CO2 clearance and PEEP effect, and could be considered as a trade-off for T-piece or PS SBTs.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-025-00788-y.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** CO2 (MESH:D002245), oxygen (MESH:D010100)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12325126/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12325126/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12325126