# Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled trial

**Authors:** Wei Wei, Wen Lu, Guofeng Chen, Jindan Gao, Jun Zhang, Defeng Zhang, Ruiqin He, Jingjing Huang, Rong Cai, Rongrong Yuan, Xun Wang, Jinxia Yu, Zilong Li, Lu Ke, Lin Gao, Zhengquan Wang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1587270 · Frontiers in Nutrition · 2025-07-23

## TL;DR

This study compared two types of feeding formulas in critically ill patients and found that one reduced stomach pain but not diarrhea.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence on the gastrointestinal effects of semi-elemental versus polymeric formulas in gastric enteral nutrition.

## Key findings

- Semi-elemental formula reduced abdominal distension/pain compared to polymeric formula.
- No significant differences were found in nausea/vomiting, aspiration, or diarrhea.
- Propensity score matching was used to control for confounders in the analysis.

## Abstract

Semi-elemental enteral nutrition (EN) might theoretically improve gastrointestinal tolerance in critically ill patients; however, it is associated with an increased risk of diarrhea when delivered postpylorically. This study aimed to assess whether the use of semi-elemental formula compared to polymeric formula may provide benefits in patients receiving gastric tube feeding.

This is a post-hoc analysis of data from a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled, investigator-initiated trial (NEED trial). Patients were eligible if they stayed in the participating intensive care units (ICUs) and received gastric EN exclusively during the first week of enrollment. A directed acyclic graph (DAG) was used to identify potential confounders. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to control for the detected confounders. The primary outcome was the incidence of intolerance-related symptoms, including nausea/vomiting, aspiration, abdominal distension/pain, and diarrhea.

PSM created 516 matched pairs from 1,548 eligible patients. The incidence of abdominal distension/pain was significantly lower in the semi-elemental group compared to the polymeric group (9.1% versus 13.8%, risk ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93; p = 0.027). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of nausea/vomiting, aspiration, or diarrhea between groups.

In critically ill patients receiving EN via gastric access, the semi-elemental formula was associated with a reduced incidence of abdominal distension/pain, but not with an increased incidence of diarrhea, compared to the polymeric formula.

https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12233792?q=ISRCTN12233792&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10, Identifier ISRCTN12233792.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** nausea/vomiting (MESH:D020250), abdominal distension/pain (MESH:D015746), diarrhea (MESH:D003967), critically ill (MESH:D016638)
- **Chemicals:** gastric EN (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12325058/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12325058/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12325058/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12325058