# No differences in knee anthropometric‐related risk factors between unilateral and bilateral ACL reconstruction: A matched MRI‐based cohort study

**Authors:** Riccardo D'Ambrosi, Fabrizio Di Maria, Luca Maria Sconfienza, Stefano Fusco, Maria Vittoria Bausano, Mattia Sica, Francesco Silletta, Elisabeth Abermann, Christian Fink

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70394 · 2025-08-05

## TL;DR

This study found no significant differences in knee risk factors between patients who had one or both knees reconstructed for ACL injuries.

## Contribution

The study introduces a matched MRI-based cohort analysis to compare unilateral and bilateral ACL reconstruction risk factors.

## Key findings

- No significant differences in knee risk factors were found between unilateral and bilateral ACL reconstruction groups.
- A statistically significant difference was observed in the femoral notch index for patients over 25 years old.
- Age, gender, and side did not significantly influence the risk factors between the groups.

## Abstract

The primary aims of this retrospective study were to (1) compare medial posterior tibial slope (mPTS), lateral posterior tibial slope (lPTS), notch index and lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) between patients who have undergone unilateral versus bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a matched cohort analysis; (2) evaluate whether subgroup differences exist based on age, gender and side; (3) assess risks factors for ACL injury using logistic models.

This retrospective study included patients who underwent primary ACLR between 2015 and 2019. Measurements of the unilaterally operated knee (n = 45) were matched using propensity score‐matched in a ratio of 1:1 with the corresponding knee in the bilateral group (n = 45) based on age, sex, side, using the greedy nearest neighbour method. Exclusion criteria included inadequate MRI quality (<1.5 Tesla), concomitant ligament injuries or fractures, and <6‐year follow‐up for unilateral ACLR patients. Five blinded reviewers measured mPTS, lPTS, femoral notch index and LFCR on MRI scans.

No significant differences were observed between the bilateral and unilateral groups for mPTS, lPTS, femoral notch index or LFCR. The mean values for the bilateral group were: mPTS, 3.84° ± 2.54°; lPTS, 6.03° ± 3.63°; notch index, 0.27 ± 0.02; and LFCR, 0.73 ± 0.07. Corresponding values for the unilateral group were: mPTS, 3.92° ± 2.94°; lPTS, 6.37° ± 3.13°; notch index, 0.27 ± 0.03; and LFCR, 0.71 ± 0.06 (all p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant difference only for the femoral notch index in patients older than 25 years: bilateral ACLR (0.29 ± 0.03) versus unilateral ACLR (0.27 ± 0.03; p = 0.027).

Patients who underwent bilateral ACLR showed no significant differences in mPTS, lPTS, femoral notch index or LFCR, compared with those who underwent unilateral ACLR, irrespective of age, gender and side.

Level III, cross‐sectional study.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** tibial or femoral fractures (MESH:D013978), malignancies (MESH:D009369), mPTS (MESH:D058923), intra-articular infections (MESH:D057072), Knee Ligaments Injuries (MESH:D007718), PACS (MESH:D003147), MTPD (MESH:D000092463), laxity (MESH:D007593), ACL rupture (MESH:D000070598), PTS (MESH:D020429), injuries (MESH:D014947), fractures (MESH:D050723), rupture (MESH:D012421), meniscal lesions (MESH:D010007)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12322698/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12322698