Interobserver reliability of the pivot shift test: A modified classification improves agreement
Juan P. Martinez‐Cano, Sebastian Mejia‐Barreto, Jacobo Triviño‐Arias, Maria C. Gomez‐Ayala, Alejandro Mejia, Juan F. Londoño, Ruben Guzman

TL;DR
This study shows that a modified classification of the pivot shift test improves agreement among doctors when assessing knee instability in ACL injuries.
Contribution
The novel contribution is a modified pivot shift test classification that increases interobserver reliability by combining grades II and III into a single high-grade category.
Findings
The modified classification achieved substantial agreement (kappa 0.73) compared to fair agreement (kappa 0.39) with the classic classification.
Combining grades II and III into a high-grade category improved agreement from poor/fair to substantial.
The modified classification is recommended for clinical and research use due to better reliability.
Abstract
The pivot shift test evaluates the anterolateral rotational instability of the knee in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interobserver reliability of the classic pivot shift test and a modified classification. An interobserver reliability study involving 4 observers and 17 patients with high suspicion of ACL injury. Observers were blind to diagnostic images and independently evaluated each patient. Kappa–Fleiss was used to assess the pivot shift test agreement between observers. Interobserver reliability was calculated for the classic classification (grades I, II and III), as well as for a modified classification in low‐grade (I) and high‐grade pivot shift (II and III). Kappa agreement was categorised as poor (<0.00), slight (0.00–0.20), fair (0.21–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), substantial (0.61–0.80) and perfect…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Sports injuries and prevention · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
