# Do Estimates of Women’s Control over Income and Decisionmaking Vary Across Nationally Representative Survey Programs?

**Authors:** Kalyani Raghunathan, Mai Mahmoud, Jessica Heckert, Gayathri Ramani, Greg Seymour

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03605-x · Social Indicators Research · 2025-04-25

## TL;DR

This paper examines how different survey programs measure women's empowerment, finding significant differences even after efforts to standardize questions.

## Contribution

The study reveals persistent inter-survey differences in measuring women's control over income and decisionmaking across nationally representative surveys.

## Key findings

- Large within-country differences remain between survey programs despite harmonization efforts.
- Survey structure and administration influence the measurement of empowerment indicators.
- Comparisons across survey programs should be made with caution due to measurement inconsistencies.

## Abstract

Empowering women is an explicit aim of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 5 and underpins 12 of the 17 SDGs. It is also a key objective of other pan-national agreements, such as the Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme. Tracking global progress toward these goals requires being able to measure empowerment in ways that are consistent and comparable—both within and across countries. However, empowerment is a complex concept, hard to quantify, and even harder to standardize across contexts. Two large survey programs—Feed the Future and the Demographic Health Surveys—ask women about two aspects of empowerment, their control over income and input into decisionmaking. Each program uses a different set of questions administered to different sub-populations of women. We use data from 12 countries to show that large within-country inter-survey differences persist even after efforts to harmonize questions and samples. Where available, we compare the FTF and DHS with the Living Standards and Measurement Surveys-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture. We present several hypotheses related to survey structure and survey administration to explain these inter-survey differences. We then either test for or rule out the role of these competing theories in driving differences in levels and in associations with commonly used characteristics. Standardizing survey measures of decisionmaking and control over income and how they are administered is important to track progress toward the SDGs; meanwhile, caution should be exercised in comparing seemingly similar survey items across survey programs.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11205-025-03605-x.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321913/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321913/full.md

## References

17 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321913/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321913