# Factorial structure, validity, and gender invariance of the UCLA-R loneliness scale in ecuadorian adolescents

**Authors:** Wilson Guillermo Siguenza Campoverde, Katy Maricela Chamba Leiva, Ted Fong, Ted Fong, Ted Fong

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328163 · PLOS One · 2025-08-04

## TL;DR

This study confirms that the 19-item UCLA-R Loneliness Scale is a reliable and valid tool for measuring loneliness in Ecuadorian adolescents, with consistent results across genders.

## Contribution

The study provides the first validation of the 19-item UCLA-R Loneliness Scale for Ecuadorian adolescents and confirms its gender invariance.

## Key findings

- The 19-item bifactor model of the UCLA-R Loneliness Scale showed the best fit and explained 40.8% of the total variance.
- The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of .876 and omega of .83).
- Factorial invariance was confirmed across genders, supporting the scale’s reliability for both male and female adolescents.

## Abstract

Loneliness has a significant impact on mental and physical health across different stages of development, with particularly evident effects during adolescence. During this period, young individuals undergo substantial social and emotional transformations, making loneliness a global concern.

This study aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the UCLA-R Loneliness Scale in Ecuadorian adolescents through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, assess its internal consistency, and examine factorial invariance across genders.

The sample consisted of 718 school-aged adolescents (288 males and 430 females) aged 14–17 years (M = 15.72, SD = 0.747), selected through probabilistic sampling. A sociodemographic ad hoc questionnaire and the Spanish version of the 20-item UCLA-R Loneliness Scale were administered. The sample was randomly divided into two equivalent subsamples (n = 359) to separately perform an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The EFA was conducted using principal axis factoring, oblique rotation, and polychoric correlations. The CFA evaluated one-factor, two-factor, and three-factor models, employing fit indices such as CFI, TLI, RMSEA, and SRMR. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega coefficients. Additionally, factorial invariance analyses by gender were performed, along with a univariate ANOVA to examine potential gender differences.

The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) results indicated the presence of two factors, whose structure explains 40.8% of the total variance, with 19 items. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed that the bifactor model with 19 items exhibited a superior fit compared to the unidimensional and three-factor models with 20 items, with fit indices falling within acceptable to excellent ranges (CFI = .936, TLI = .927, RMSEA = .050, SRMR = .048). Additionally, the bifactor model demonstrated measurement invariance across genders. Regarding internal consistency, the scale demonstrated a Cronbach’s alpha of.876 and an omega coefficient of.83, confirming its reliability.

It is concluded that the 19-item UCLA-R Loneliness Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing perceived loneliness in Ecuadorian adolescents, regardless of gender. Future research could replicate these findings in other regions and cultural contexts to validate its use on a larger scale.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** emotional loneliness (MESH:D003072), chronic illness (MESH:D002908), depression (MESH:D003866), dementia (MESH:D003704), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (MESH:D029424), stroke (MESH:D020521), anxiety (MESH:D001007)
- **Chemicals:** alcohol (MESH:D000438), PONE-D-25-08122R1 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321113/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321113/full.md

## References

86 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321113/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321113