Correction: Subjective and psychophysical olfactory and gustatory dysfunction among COVID-19 outpatients; short- and long-term results
Mads Mose Jensen, Kasper Daugaard Larsen, Anne-Sophie Homøe, Anders Lykkemark Simonsen, Elisabeth Arndal, Anders Koch, Grethe Badsberg Samuelsen, Xiaohui Chen Nielsen, Tobias Todsen, Preben Homøe
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies · Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
In Table 3, the headings Subjective olfactory dysfunction and Psychophysical olfactory dysfunction are swapped in the second and third columns. The second column should be Psychophysical olfactory dysfunction and the third should be Subjective olfactory dysfunction. Please see the correct Table 3 here.
Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values of subjective and psychosocial olfactory dysfunction as diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 positivity
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Jensen MM, Larsen KD, Homøe A-S, Simonsen AL, Arndal E, Koch A, et al. Subjective and psychophysical olfactory and gustatory dysfunction among COVID-19 outpatients; short- and long-term results. P Lo S One. 2022;17(10):e 0275518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275518 36191024 PMC 9529127 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗