# Intraindividual, intraspecific, and interspecific variation shapes natural selection and its detection in two convergently-evolved lizard species

**Authors:** Simone Des Roches, Max R. Lambert, Michaela S. Brinkmeyer, Jacqueline M. Howells, Andy Dettinger, Erica Bree Rosenblum

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326443 · PLOS One · 2025-08-04

## TL;DR

This study shows that variation within individuals affects how natural selection is detected in two lizard species evolving in the same environment.

## Contribution

The study introduces a contingency analysis to assess how intraindividual variation influences inferences about natural selection.

## Key findings

- Intraindividual variation affects which traits are inferred to be under selection.
- Measurement instance (first, last, or median) influences selection inferences.
- Lizard species show convergent evolution but experience different selection regimes.

## Abstract

Much of our understanding of how natural selection operates comes from studies of highly heritable traits presumed to vary little within individuals. Here we show that intraindividual (within-individual) phenotypic variation is an important source of intraspecific variation, shaping both natural selection and its detection in wild, open populations. We employed a multi-year capture-mark-recapture (CMR) study of two lizard species (Sceloporus cowlesi and Holbrookia maculata) at the ecotone between the white gypsum dunes at White Sands National Park and the surrounding dark Chihuahuan desert soils. Unlike many CMR studies examining selection on morphology, we measured individuals’ traits at each capture. We found that our inferences into which traits were under selection depended on which measurement instance we used (first, last, or median measurement of all measurements of a given trait), and, therefore, the degree of intraindividual variation within each trait. We present a contingency analysis to facilitate assessing when traits are under selection, when they are not, and when intraindividual variation complicates these inferences. Beyond these conceptual advances, our work has implications for the White Sands system, a model system for repeated evolution. In particular, both lizard species experience different selection regimes within the same ecotonal habitat, despite both showing convergent evolution in dorsal blanching on White Sands.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Sceloporus cowlesi (taxon 190875), Holbrookia maculata (taxon 43597)

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Laniidae (shrikes, family) [taxon 9193], Holbrookia maculata (lesser earless lizard, species) [taxon 43597], Parus major (Great Tit, species) [taxon 9157], Sceloporus undulatus (fence lizard, species) [taxon 8520], Sceloporus cowlesi (White Sands prairie lizard, species) [taxon 190875], Lepidosauria (lepidosaurs, class) [taxon 8504], Zootoca vivipara (common lizard, species) [taxon 8524], Falco tinnunculus (common kestrel, species) [taxon 100819]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321066/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321066/full.md

## References

63 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321066/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12321066