# Early migration patterns of calcium phosphate versus hydroxyapatite-coated stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial using radiostereometric analysis

## TL;DR

This study compares early migration of two types of coatings on hip implants and finds similar long-term stability.

## Contribution

The study provides new clinical evidence on the migration patterns of calcium phosphate versus hydroxyapatite-coated stems in hip implants.

## Key findings

- No significant differences in migration between the two stems at 5-year follow-up.
- Calcium phosphate-coated stems showed less migration compared to hydroxyapatite-coated stems up to 2 years.
- Calcium phosphate coating is as safe as hydroxyapatite in terms of implant stability.

## Abstract

The design and coating of uncemented joint implants impact bone ingrowth and thereby the stability of the implant. This prospective randomized clinical trial aimed to compare early migration of two uncemented, similarly shaped femoral stems with either calcium phosphate or hydroxyapatite coating.

93 patients (102 hips) were randomized to either an intervention calcium phosphate or a conventional hydroxyapatite-coated stem. Migration measurements were performed postoperatively, and at 6 weeks, 3, 12 months, and 2 and 5 years after operation, and analyzed with radiostereometric analysis.

There were no significant differences in migration between the two stems from postoperative to 5-year follow-up. With 6 weeks follow-up as baseline, the calcium phosphate coated stem showed a tendency towards migrating less with a maximum total point motion up to 2 years of 0.84 mm (0.68 to 1.00 95% CI) compared to the hydroxyapatite-coated stem which migrated 1.25 mm (0.99 to 1.52 95% CI) (P = 0.010).

Our data show that the calcium phosphate-coated stem is a safe implant in terms of ingrowth stability, and with migration patterns comparable to a hydroxyapatite-coated stem.