# Clinical significance and gene prediction of a novel classification system based on tacrolimus concentration-to-dose ratio in the early post-liver transplant period

**Authors:** Junwei Fan, Peihao Wen, Liyun Yuan, Yan Xia, Shijie Hu, Xiaoqing Zhang, Zhihai Peng

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1614753 · Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2025-07-21

## TL;DR

This study introduces a new classification system for tacrolimus clearance in liver transplant patients and a genetic prediction method to improve its accuracy.

## Contribution

A novel clinical-FIS classification and a genetic-EIP prediction system for tacrolimus elimination in liver transplant recipients.

## Key findings

- The clinical-FIS classification divides patients into fast, intermediate, and slow elimination groups based on tacrolimus CDR.
- The genetic-EIP classification, including donor and recipient genetic factors, showed 73.2% consistency with the clinical-FIS classification.
- Higher tacrolimus concentrations in slow elimination patients were linked to delayed liver and kidney recovery and higher infection rates.

## Abstract

Classification system of tacrolimus elimination and its clinical significance has not been well described in liver transplantation. This study aimed to present a novel tacrolimus clearance clinical-FIS (Fast-Intermediate-Slow) classification and its gene prediction system.

Patients from 3 transplant centers were enrolled in this study. All recipients and their corresponding donor livers from center 1 were genotyped using an Affymetrix DMET Plus microarray, and association analysis was performed using trough blood concentration/weight-adjusted-dose ratios (CDR, (ng/mL)/(mg/kg)). The candidate-associated loci were then sequenced in center 2 and center 3 patients for verification.

A clinical classification based on tacrolimus CDR can effectively divide liver transplantation patients into fast elimination (FE), intermediate elimination (IE), and slow elimination (SE) groups, which we called the clinical-FIS classification. Trough blood concentrations in the clinical-SE group during the early postoperative period were higher than those in the clinical-FE and clinical-IE groups, which could lead to delayed recovery of liver (P = 0.0373) and kidney function (P = 0.0135) and a higher infection rate (P = 0.0086). The prediction accuracy of the current CPIC (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium)-EIP metabolizer classification based on recipient CYP3A5 rs776746 genotype for clinical-FIS classification was only 35.56%. A newly established genetic-EIP classification including major effect genetic factors (donor and recipient CYP3A5 rs776746) and minor effect genetic factors (recipient SULT1E1 rs3775770 and donor SLC7A8 rs7141505) showed 73.2% overall consistency with the former clinical FIS classification.

Our study presented a novel tacrolimus clearance classification, clinical-FIS, and then proposed a novel prospective genetic-EIP classification as a genotyping basis for precisely predicting the clinical-FIS.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** CYP3A5 (cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 5) [NCBI Gene 1577], SULT1E1 (sulfotransferase family 1E member 1) [NCBI Gene 6783], SLC7A8 (solute carrier family 7 member 8) [NCBI Gene 23428]
- **Chemicals:** tacrolimus (PubChem CID 445643)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** SLC7A8 (solute carrier family 7 member 8) [NCBI Gene 23428] {aka LAT2, LPI-PC1}, CYP3A5 (cytochrome P450 family 3 subfamily A member 5) [NCBI Gene 1577] {aka CP35, CYPIIIA5, P450PCN3, PCN3}, SULT1E1 (sulfotransferase family 1E member 1) [NCBI Gene 6783] {aka EST, EST-1, ST1E1, STE}
- **Diseases:** infection (MESH:D007239)
- **Chemicals:** tacrolimus (MESH:D016559)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Mutations:** rs776746, rs3775770, rs7141505

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12319242/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12319242/full.md

## References

36 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12319242/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12319242