# Cost-effectiveness analysis of cadonilimab plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment option in HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer

**Authors:** Longfeng Zhang, Qingsheng Yang, Zhiwei Zheng

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1644176 · Frontiers in Public Health · 2025-07-21

## TL;DR

This study evaluates whether adding cadonilimab to chemotherapy is cost-effective for treating HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer in China.

## Contribution

The study provides new cost-effectiveness evidence for cadonilimab in combination with chemotherapy in HER-2-negative gastric cancer in China.

## Key findings

- Cadonilimab plus chemotherapy showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 54,502.42 USD per QALY in all patients.
- For PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 subgroup, the ICER was 26,813.44 USD per QALY, suggesting potential cost-effectiveness.
- Probabilistic analysis showed 93.9% probability of cost-effectiveness for PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 subgroup.

## Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using cadonilimab plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy in HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted utilizing a partitioned survival model to simulate the expected costs and outcomes associated with the treatment of patients with cadonilimab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy over a 10 years lifetime horizon. Cost data were sourced from published literature and national databases. Data on treatment efficacy, adverse events, and transition probabilities were derived from the phase 3 COMPASSION-15 trial. The WTP threshold in this study was established at 40,343.68 USD per QALY. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the results and assess the impact of variations in key parameters on the cost-effectiveness outcomes.

The base case analysis revealed that in all population of randomized patients, treatment with cadonilimab resulted in an incremental gain of 1.08 QALYs compared to chemotherapy, at an incremental cost of 58,862.61 USD. The ICER for this cohort was calculated to be 54,502.42 USD per QALY. In the subgroup of patients with a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, patients treated with cadonilimab experienced a greater increase in 1.33 QALYs compared to chemotherapy, at an incremental cost of 35,661.87 USD. The ICER for this subgroup was 26,813.44 USD per QALY. Sensitivity analyses conducted demonstrated the robustness of the results to variations in model inputs and assumptions. Moreover, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that cadonilimab in combination with chemotherapy had a 4.70 and 93.90% probabilities of being considered cost-effective at a WTP threshold of 40,343.68 USD per QALY for the all randomized patient group and the subgroup of patients with a PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5, respectively.

The addition of cadonilimab to standard chemotherapy for first line treatment of HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer may not be considered a cost-effective option compared to chemotherapy alone. However, for the subgroup of patients with PD-L1CPS ≥ 5, the ICER was 26,813.44 USD per QALY, indicating that this treatment approach could potentially be deemed cost-effective in China.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** gastric cancer (MONDO:0001056)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CD274 (CD274 molecule) [NCBI Gene 29126] {aka ADMIO5, B7-H, B7H1, PD-L1, PDCD1L1, PDCD1LG1}, ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2) [NCBI Gene 2064] {aka CD340, HER-2, HER-2/neu, HER2, MLN 19, MLN-19}
- **Diseases:** gastric cancer (MESH:D013274)
- **Chemicals:** cadonilimab (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12318942/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12318942/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12318942/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12318942