# Clinical impact of first-line therapeutic strategies in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: real-world evidence and prognostic insight

**Authors:** Chia-Chang Yeh, Shih-Wei Chiang, Feng-Fan Chiang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1608538 · Frontiers in Oncology · 2025-07-21

## TL;DR

This study examines real-world treatment outcomes for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer, finding that chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF provides the best survival, while BRAF-targeted therapies show high response rates.

## Contribution

The study provides real-world evidence comparing first-line treatment strategies for BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, identifying survival and response trends in a clinical cohort.

## Key findings

- Chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) showed longest OS (21.2 months) and PFS (10.5 months) in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC.
- BRAF-targeted therapies achieved the highest ORR (53.8%) and DCR (76.9%) despite shorter survival outcomes.
- Right-sided tumors were unexpectedly associated with improved survival (HR: 0.20).

## Abstract

BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is associated with poor prognosis and limited response to standard therapies. Recent clinical trials have explored the benefit of targeted therapies, but real-world data remain limited.

This retrospective study analyzed 36 patients with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC who received first-line treatment between 2018 and 2024 at Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Patients were grouped by initial regimen: chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF (bevacizumab), or chemotherapy combined with BRAF-targeted ± MEK inhibitors. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

Mean OS and PFS were longest in patients receiving chemotherapy plus anti-VEGF (21.2 and 10.5 months, respectively), compared to chemotherapy alone (OS 14 months, PFS 7.7 months) and anti-BRAF targeted therapy (OS 13.5 months, PFS 6.5 months). The highest ORR (53.8%) and DCR (76.9%) were observed in patients receiving BRAF-targeted regimens. Multivariate analysis identified liver metastasis and ECOG ≥2 as poor prognostic factors. Unexpectedly, right-sided tumors were associated with improved survival (HR: 0.20, p = 0.028). Subsequent use of BRAF-targeted therapy in some patients may have contributed to extended OS.

In this real-world cohort, chemotherapy combined with anti-VEGF provided the best survival outcomes, while BRAF-targeted strategies showed promising response rates. Liver involvement and poor performance status remained negative prognostic indicators. These findings support a personalized treatment approach and highlight the need for continued prospective validation.

## Linked entities

- **Genes:** BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) [NCBI Gene 673]
- **Diseases:** colorectal cancer (MONDO:0005575)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** RBBP4 (RB binding protein 4, chromatin remodeling factor) [NCBI Gene 5928] {aka NURF55, RBAP48, lin-53}, VEGFA (vascular endothelial growth factor A) [NCBI Gene 7422] {aka L-VEGF, MVCD1, VEGF, VPF}, MAP2K7 (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 7) [NCBI Gene 5609] {aka JNKK2, MAPKK7, MEK, MEK 7, MKK7, PRKMK7}, BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) [NCBI Gene 673] {aka B-RAF1, B-raf, BRAF-1, BRAF1, NS7, RAFB1}, EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) [NCBI Gene 1956] {aka ERBB, ERBB1, ERRP, HER1, NISBD2, NNCIS}
- **Diseases:** cancer (MESH:D009369), Liver involvement (MESH:D017093), MSI-H (MESH:D053842), Metastatic colorectal cancer (MESH:D015179), toxicities (MESH:D064420), death (MESH:D003643), -involved metastasis (MESH:D009362)
- **Chemicals:** FOLFIRI (-), panitumumab (MESH:D000077544), bevacizumab (MESH:D000068258), cetuximab (MESH:D000068818), binimetinib (MESH:C581313), encorafenib (MESH:C000601108), FOLFOX (MESH:C410216)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Mutations:** BRAFV600E

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12318728/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12318728/full.md

## References

21 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12318728/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12318728