# The impact of Evidence-Based Pharmacy on the quality of pharmaceutical care: A survey study

**Authors:** Piotr Ratajczak, Barbara Jacieczko, Bartosz Kędziora, Dorota Kopciuch, Anna Paczkowska, Tomasz Zaprutko, Krzysztof Kus, Ebenezer Wiafe, Ebenezer Wiafe, Ebenezer Wiafe

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329016 · PLOS One · 2025-08-01

## TL;DR

This study explores how Evidence-Based Pharmacy is applied by Polish pharmacy professionals and identifies factors influencing its use, such as experience and training.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into the current state of EBPharm knowledge and practice among pharmacy professionals in Poland.

## Key findings

- EBPharm principles are widely applied, with professional experience and higher salaries significantly associated with their use.
- Only 30.35% of participants received formal EBPharm training, and 8.42% considered it sufficient.
- Pharmacy technicians frequently use informal sources and show limited familiarity with frameworks like PICO.

## Abstract

Applying Evidence-Based Pharmacy (EBPharm) principles is essential in pharmacy practice as it allows therapeutic decisions to be grounded in the best available scientific evidence. This approach enables pharmacists to provide patients with more effective and safer therapies, reducing the risk of adverse effects. This study assessed the EBPharm knowledge level among pharmacy professionals. Data were collected using a custom-designed online survey. The study also explored and defined the concept of EBPharm, offering insights into medical databases, types of scientific research, and evaluations of their quality and reliability. The study revealed widespread application of EBPharm principles among Polish pharmacy professionals, with significant associations between their use and factors such as professional experience (Chi² = 7.905518, p = 0.04801) and higher salaries. Respondents with formal EBPharm training demonstrated improved ability to evaluate scientific evidence (Chi² = 12.03125, p = 0.00244), while financial stability was linked to better systematic review skills (Chi² = 43.15693, p = 0.00000) and use of databases (Chi² = 63.14029, p = 0.00000). However, knowledge gaps remain, particularly among less experienced professionals, with only 30.35% of participants receiving formal training and 8.42% deeming it sufficient. Frequent use of informal sources by pharmacy technicians and limited familiarity with frameworks like PICO (Chi² = 37.65817, p = 0.00000) highlight the need for accessible, structured education. Targeted training, financial incentives, and greater reliance on reliable sources could enhance EBPharm integration, improving care quality and patient safety.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** diabetes (MESH:D003920), fatigue (MESH:D005221), hypertension (MESH:D006973)
- **Chemicals:** PONE-D-25-12319R1 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12316249/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12316249/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12316249/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12316249