# Investigating the content and processes of patient-derived quality of care indicators for those affected by multiple long-term conditions (MLTC): A scoping review protocol

## TL;DR

This study aims to understand what quality of care means for people with multiple long-term health conditions and how to measure it effectively.

## Contribution

The study introduces a scoping review protocol to explore patient-derived quality of care indicators for those with multiple long-term conditions.

## Key findings

- Current quality of care indicators for multiple long-term conditions often fail to capture patient preferences or complex care processes.
- There is a lack of understanding on how to measure quality of care that meets the specific needs of individuals with multiple long-term conditions.
- The review will help inform the development of new quality of care indicators tailored for this population.

## Abstract

People living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) are reported to have poorer quality of life, worse health outcomes, and higher health-related expenses compared to those with singular chronic health conditions. Living with MLTC is associated with a higher risk of care that is duplicate or unnecessary. Understanding and monitoring the quality of care (QoC) for those with MLTC is imperative to ensure that individuals complex care needs are met, maximising health and wellbeing and minimising harm and social/economic burden. There is paucity on what QoC means in the context of MLTC, which is likely different than a mere amalgamation of quality indicators of each contributory condition. There is even less understanding on how QoC can be measured in a way that meets the specific care priorities of individuals with MLTC. The aim of this review is to systematically map and analyse evidence on what QoC means for those affected by MLTC and the content and processes of any existing QoC indicators in MLTC, developed with patient or caregivers.

We will systematically search for evidence following a Levac et al methodological scoping review process. All eligible studies published in English from 2000 onwards in the following databases will be included: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Global Health and Health Management Information Consortium. Given expected study heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis is anticipated. Our Community Partner Advisory Group will assist in the identification and analysis of relevant evidence.

Current evidence shows variations in concepts and approaches when developing, implementing or validating QoC indicators, not always capturing patients’ preferences nor the complex processes required in MLTC care. Clarifying concepts and synthesising evidence-based knowledge in this area will be the first step to inform the development of a project aiming to develop a set of patient-derived QoC indicators for use across multiple settings in the United Kingdom (UK) and beyond.

Available on Open Science Framework on https://osf.io/gjr84.