Correction to: Hippocampal subfields and their neocortical interactions during autobiographical memory

Pitshaporn Leelaarporn; Marshall A. Dalton; Rüdiger Stirnberg; Tony Stöcker; Annika Spottke; Anja Schneider; Cornelia McCormick

PMC · DOI:10.1162/imag_x_00159·May 20, 2024

Correction to: Hippocampal subfields and their neocortical interactions during autobiographical memory

Pitshaporn Leelaarporn, Marshall A. Dalton, Rüdiger Stirnberg, Tony Stöcker, Annika Spottke, Anja Schneider, Cornelia McCormick

PDF

Open Access

Abstract

Linked entities

Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.

Genes1

CA4

Proteins1

Species1

Homo sapiens(human · species)

Diseases1

MA

Figures1

Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.

E](#f1)was previously incorrect and is corrected here. No changes to the original figure legend or any other text are needed. The corrected graph in[Figure 1E](#f1)displays the comparison between the percentage of the signal change during AM and MA in hippocampal subfields along the entire longitudinal axis (DG/CA4, CA1, CA2/3, subiculum, and pre/parasubiculum), where activation during AM was significantly stronger in the pre/parasubiculum compared with the CA1, the CA2/3, and the subiculum, whereas there was a non-significant trend level in the DG/CA4.[Figure 1G](#f1)is correctly presented, w

Peer Reviews

No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.

Videos

No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.

Taxonomy

TopicsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Full text

Figure 1Ewas previously incorrect and is corrected here. No changes to the original figure legend or any other text are needed. The corrected graph inFigure 1Edisplays the comparison between the percentage of the signal change during AM and MA in hippocampal subfields along the entire longitudinal axis (DG/CA4, CA1, CA2/3, subiculum, and pre/parasubiculum), where activation during AM was significantly stronger in the pre/parasubiculum compared with the CA1, the CA2/3, and the subiculum, whereas there was a non-significant trend level in the DG/CA4.Figure 1Gis correctly presented, where the activation detected in the anterior portion of the pre/parasubiculum was found stronger in comparison to the other subfields.