# Incipient Genetic Differentiation of the African Buffalo, Syncerus caffer Populations: Is Fencing Playing a Role?

## TL;DR

This study examines how fencing affects the genetic diversity of African buffalo populations in East Africa, finding early signs of genetic isolation.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into the genetic effects of fencing on megaherbivores, particularly the African buffalo.

## Key findings

- Fenced buffalo populations showed higher nucleotide diversity than unfenced ones.
- Genetic differentiation among buffalo populations was weak but suggested recent differentiation.
- Fencing appears to distort isolation by distance, indicating early genetic erosion.

## Abstract

Fences are increasingly used globally as a management tool in conservation to reduce wildlife depredations, disease transmission, and wildlife mortality. There are a limited number of studies on the genetic effects of perimeter fencing of protected areas on megaherbivores. Using population genetic analyses on 226 sequences of a 400 bp fragment of the mtDNA Dloop from 10 East African buffalo populations (3 fenced and 7 unfenced), the influence of spatial isolation and fencing on buffalo population genetic diversity and genetic differentiation was examined. Mean gene diversity between fenced and unfenced buffalo populations was not different (fenced: 0.978 ± 0.003, unfenced: 0.973 ± 0.004, p = 0.300), but nucleotide diversity was higher in fenced than unfenced populations (fenced: 0.038 ± 0.019, unfenced: 0.030 ± 0.015, p = 0.005). Genetic differentiation among buffalo populations based on haplotype frequencies and model‐based genetic distance was weak (FST = 0.08, ΦST = 0.06) and contributed to 6.2% and 8.5% of total genetic variance, respectively. Ninety‐three percent of population pairs were genetically differentiated by distances determined from haplotype frequencies, but only 51% of population pairs were differentiated using modeled distances, suggesting recent differentiation. There was no correlation between linearized FST and geographical distance (r = −0.005, p = 0.52), but linearized ΦST was moderately correlated with geographic distance (r = 0.329, p = 0.03). The distance effect was greater when fenced populations were excluded (ΦST: r = 0.464, p = 0.05), suggesting that insularization due to fencing is distorting isolation by distance. SSD analyses revealed that 2 of 3 fenced populations and 2 of 7 unfenced populations had non‐unimodal distributions, suggesting demographically declining populations. Our study reveals the high genetic diversity but warns that genetic erosion due to isolation, including fencing, is likely setting in and will have an impact on East African buffalo populations.

Isolation by distance indicated that fences play a role in the genetic deterioration of confined species. The weak effects of fencing could be associated with the short period that effective fences have been in place to impact the genetics of the fenced population. The findings underscore the high genetic diversity and warn that genetic erosion due to anthropogenic activities, including fencing, is only beginning to take effect in the East African buffalo populations.