Singleplex real-time PCR and duplex PCR platform for the rapid detection of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae
Jiaqi Wang, Yishuai Wu, Liying Zhao, Mengran Xing, Yangyang Huang, Shengjie Peng, Chunyan Xu, Hong Yao, Chenglong Li, Xiang-Dang Du

TL;DR
This paper introduces fast and accurate PCR methods to detect hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae, a dangerous pathogen, using specific genetic markers.
Contribution
The study develops singleplex and duplex real-time PCR assays for rapid HvKP detection with high sensitivity and specificity.
Findings
Singleplex PCR assays showed high linearity and a detection limit of 10^3 cfu/mL.
Duplex PCR assays achieved high specificity and detection limits ranging from 10^4 to 10^5 cfu/mL.
The assays can efficiently identify HvKP strains using SYBR Green I-based melting curve analysis.
Abstract
Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (HvKP) is a notorious zoonotic pathogen that poses a significant threat to public health, as it can cause severe infections with high morbidity and mortality among young and healthy individuals. Commonly, a positive string test is primarily used to identify HvKP strains, but which is laborious and time-consuming. A rapid assay to identify HvKP is needed for public health personnel to track the spread of these strains and provide timely efforts for their control. Given this context, rapid SYBR Green I-based singleplex real-time PCR assays were developed for defining HvKP on the basis of the biomarkers iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively. These four singleplex PCR assays all displayed a high degree of linearity (R2 > 0.99) in the range of 104 to 109 cfu/mL, and the limit of detection (LOD) was 103 cfu/mL, which was equivalent to 10…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Gene | Orientation | Primer (5′–3′) | Concentration (nM) | Amplicon size | Amplicon Tm | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singleplex PCR | Duplex PCR | (bp) | (°C) | ||||
|
| forward | CTA TGG GCT ATT GTA TCC TGT | 500 | 200 | 195 | 85.0 | This study |
| reverse | ATG TGA CTT TCT TTC CGC AGA | ||||||
|
| forward-1 | GCT GCG CTA CTT CCC TTA TTA CCT G | 500 | – | 200 | 86.5 | This study |
| reverse-1 | AGT TAC CTT TTA CGT TCC AGT ACG GAT | ||||||
| forward-2 | GTT CGT GAA ACC AAA GAC | 500 | 300 | 413 | 87.5 | This study | |
| reverse-2 | AAC GGT TCA TGA GAC TTA | ||||||
|
| forward | GCC AGC GTC TAT TTC AAC TT | 500 | 200 | 99 | 76.0 | ( |
| reverse | CGG CAA GTC CTG GGT TTA C | ||||||
| plasmid-borne | forward-1 | AGC ACA AAA GAA ACA TAA GAG TAT TGG TTG ACA GC | 500 | – | 128 | 80.0 | This study |
| reverse-1 | CCC CGA AAC GTC AAG CCA CAT CCA T | ||||||
| forward-2 | CAA GGA TGT AAA CAT AGT G | 500 | 500 | 274 | 78.5 | This study | |
| reverse-2 | CCC TTT AGG ATA AAA CCG | ||||||
| Methods | Targets | Detection indicators | Assay time | Costs | LOD | Specificity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larvae | ~7 d | Purchase | – a | 31.0% | ( | ||
| Murine infection model | CD1 mouse | Median lethal dose between 10–106 cfu after intraperitoneal or subcutaneous challenged with isolate | ~14 d | Purchase CD1 mouse, animal facility, biosafety cabinet, incubator, etc. | – a | Standard method | ( |
| Phenotypic tests | |||||||
| Quantitative mucoviscosity assay | Isolate | ~24 h | Purchase biosafety cabinet, centrifuge, incubator, spectrophotometer etc. | – a | 93.3%/86.7% (grown in LB or c-M9-te broth) | ( | |
| Serum killing assay | Isolate | Serum-resistant grade 5 or 6 | ~16 h | Purchase biosafety cabinet, incubator, spectrophotometer etc. | – a | 60.0% | ( |
| Siderophore production assessment | Isolate | ~16 h | Purchase required reagents, biosafety cabinet, centrifuge, incubator, etc. | – a | 94.0% | ( | |
| String test | Isolate | Viscous string | ~16 h | Purchase blood agar plates, inoculating loops, biosafety cabinet, incubator, etc. | – a | 91.0% | ( |
| PCR-based tests | |||||||
| Singleplex PCR | Gene | Specific band on gel | ~4 h | Purchase block heater, centrifuge, DNA electrophoresis cell, gel imaging system, thermal cycler, etc. | – a | 98.1% | ( |
| Gene | 92.7% | ||||||
| Gene plasmid-borne | 100% | ||||||
| Gene plasmid-borne | 95.6% | ||||||
| Singleplex PCR | Gene | Specific band on gel | ~4 h | Purchase DNA electrophoresis cell, gel imaging system, thermal cycler, etc. | 2 | 100% | ( |
| Gene | |||||||
| Duplex PCR | Gene | Specific bands on gel | ~4 h | Purchase block heater, centrifuge, DNA electrophoresis cell, gel imaging system, thermal cycler, etc. | 12.5 ng genomic DNA | – a | ( |
| Triplex PCR | Gene | ||||||
| Quadruplex PCR | Gene | ||||||
| Quintuplex PCR | IncHIB replicon gene, | Specific bands on gel | ~4 h | Purchase DNA electrophoresis cell, gel imaging system, thermal cycler, water bath, etc. | – a | High specificity | ( |
| Nonuplex PCR | Gene | Specific bands on gel | ~4 h | Purchase centrifuge, DNA electrophoresis cell, gel imaging system, thermal cycler, water bath, etc. | 2 cfu | High specificity | ( |
| Real-time PCR-based tests | |||||||
| Singleplex real-time PCR | Gene | Ct value and melting peak | ~2 h | Purchase block heater, centrifuge, thermal cycler, etc. | 10 cfu | High specificity | This study |
| Gene | |||||||
| Gene | |||||||
| Gene plasmid-borne | |||||||
| Singleplex real-time PCR | Gene | Melting peak | ~2 h | Purchase block heater, thermal cycler, etc. | – a | – a | ( |
| Gene | |||||||
| Gene | |||||||
| Singleplex real-time PCR | Gene | Ct value and melting peak | ~2 h | Purchase thermal cycler, etc. | 500 fg genomic DNA | High specificity | ( |
| Singleplex real-time PCR | Gene | Ct value | ~2 h | Purchase thermal cycler, etc. | 200 copies plasmid | – a | ( |
| Gene | |||||||
| Duplex real-time PCR | Gene | Melting peaks | ~2 h | Purchase block heater, centrifuge, thermal cycler, etc. | 102 cfu | High specificity | This study |
| Gene | 102 cfu | ||||||
| Gene | 103 cfu | ||||||
| Quadruplex real-time PCR | Gene | Ct values | ~2 h | Purchase centrifuge, thermal cycler, etc. | 20 cfu | High specificity | ( |
| Quadruplex real-time PCR | Gene | Ct values | ~2 h | Purchase block heater, centrifuge, thermal cycler, etc. | 1.5 | 98.0–98.3% | ( |
| Other tests | |||||||
| Singleplex CRISPR/Cas13a detection | Gene | Control/Test line color | ~2 h | Purchase block heater, etc. | 10.25 ng/mL genomic DNA | High specificity | ( |
| Singleplex LAMP | Gene | Color change | ~1 h | Purchase block heater, centrifuge, etc. | 1.5 | 95.2% | ( |
| Gene | 1.5 | 95.5% | |||||
| Singleplex RAA | Gene | Fluorescent signal | ~0.5 h | Purchase thermal cycler, etc. | 20 copies plasmid | 100% | ( |
| Gene | |||||||
| Sextuplex CRISPR/Cas12a detection | Gene | Fluorescent signal | ~1 h | Purchase block heater, etc. | 1 cfu | High specificity | ( |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria · Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing · Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
Introduction
1
Klebsiella pneumoniae is an increasingly important opportunistic pathogen in zoonoses that is clinically isolated from a wide range of samples, including the gastrointestinal tract, respiratory tract and urinary tract in both animals, humans and the environment, and commonly causes nosocomial infections, including bacteremia, pneumonia and urinary tract infections (1–4). Unlike classical K. pneumoniae (cKP), a distinct pathotype of K. pneumoniae, hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (HvKP) has emerged as a notorious pathogen capable of causing community-acquired and increasingly healthcare-associated infections, including pyogenic liver abscess and other severe organ and life-threatening infections, among healthy individuals of any age. Alarmingly, carbapenem-resistant HvKP, colistin-resistant HvKP and tigecycline-resistant HvKP have emerged, creating a new challenge in combating these threats, as they are hypervirulent, multidrug-resistant and highly transmissible (5–9). Given the increasing emergence and global dissemination of HvKP, rapidly detecting and continuously surveilling such organism is a priority.
Traditional methods, such as colony morphology, Galleria mellonella or mouse lethality assays and serum killing assay, especially the string test, have been widely used for identifying HvKP (10, 11). However, these methods are costly, time-consuming and are not suitable for the rapid detection of HvKP. Moreover, for the widely used string test, studies have shown that not all HvKP isolates are hypermucoviscous, which limits the accuracy of this method to 90% (2, 12). The development of accurate and rapid methods for the identification of HvKP is urgently needed for healthcare providers and public health personnel to track the dissemination of these strains and take timely actions for their control.
With the advantages of accuracy, low cost, rapidity and robustness, PCR-based methods have been widely used for the identification of pathogens (13). Recently, a quintuplex PCR was developed for the detection of HvKP, which targets the plasmid replicon gene, iroN (encodes siderophore salmochelin receptor), iutA (encodes ferric aerobactin receptor), plasmid-borne rmpA and plasmid-borne rmpA2 (regulates capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis), and agarose gel electrophoresis with GelStar nucleic acid gel stain revealed that the amplicons ranged from 160 bp to 683 bp in size (14). Moreover, a nonuplex PCR was established for the detection of HvKP, which targets genes allS (associates with allantoin metabolism), entB (involves in siderophore enterobactin biosynthesis), iutA, kfu (mediates ferric iron uptake), magA (relates with the K1 serotype), mrkD (encodes type 3 fimbrial adhesin), plasmid-borne rmpA, wzi (relates with the K2 serotype) and ybtS (involves in siderophore yersiniabactin biosynthesis), and agarose gel electrophoresis staining with ethidium bromide revealed that the amplicons were in the range of 242 base pairs (bp) to 1,283 bp (15). However, these traditional PCR methods require agarose gels or other post-PCR processing methods, which always suffering from unsatisfactory limit of detection (LOD), poor specificity and contamination.
As a superior alternative, real-time PCR coupled with melting curve analysis has the advantages of avoiding post-PCR operations, reducing contamination risks, and improving the LOD and specificity has been used for the screening of virulence genes in HvKP, such as the singleplex real-time PCRs which target iucA (involves in siderophore aerobactin biosynthesis), peg-344 (metabolite transporter) and rmpA (both plasmid-borne rmpA, rmpA2 and chromosome-borne rmpA), respectively (16). However, for the identification of HvKP, in addition to the above-mentioned genes, other genes, such as iroB (involves in siderophore salmochelin biosynthesis), irp2 (involves in siderophore yersiniabactin biosynthesis), peg-589 (metabolite transport), peg-1631 (metabolite transport), terB (encodes tellurite resistance protein), wzx (K serotype-specific allele) and wzy (K serotype-specific allele), are associated with HvKP, which suggests that more real-time PCRs for these related genes should be developed and used simultaneously to differentiate HvKP from cKP (12, 14, 15, 17). Fortunately, studies have proposed that the virulence-related genes iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA are biomarkers for the differentiation of HvKP from cKP with diagnostic accuracies greater than 0.96 (12, 18–20). Therefore, in this study, SYBR Green I-based singleplex real-time PCR methods that target biomarkers of HvKP, including iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA were developed. Moreover, in terms of cost savings and rapidity, duplex detection methods with melting curve analysis were established. These developed assays with low LODs and high specificities provide efficient tools for identifying and tracking the spread of HvKP in animals, humans and the environment.
Materials and methods
2
Samples
2.1
HvKP strain 20 K-368 (ST65, K2; iroB^+^, iucA^+^, peg-344^+^, plasmid-borne rmpA^+^), and HvKP strain 19 K-29 (iucA^+^, plasmid-borne rmpA^+^ and rmpA2^+^) were isolated and identified as HvKP by the string test (which showed viscous string stretching from the bacterial colony 5 mm) and sequencing analysis. Other K. pneumoniae strains, 19 K-1018, 19 K-1024 and 19 K-1028, were isolated and identified as cKP. Other isolates used in this study, including Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli EC23030102 and Salmonella typhimurium SQ1, and Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus SA23033004 and Streptococcus suis L915 were collected and stored in our laboratory. The colony counting method was used to determine the bacterial number. Bacterial genomic DNA was rapidly extracted from the isolates via MightyPrep reagent (TaKaRa Bio, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan).
Primer design
2.2
The genome sequences of the biomarkers iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA carried by the HvKP strain NTUH-K2044 (accession number AP006726) were retrieved from GenBank (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA). On the basis of the DNA sequences of iroB with 1,116 bp, iucA with 1791 bp, peg-344 with 903 bp and plasmid-borne rmpA with 633 bp, primers were designed via Oligo 7 under default settings (Molecular Biology Insights, Colorado Springs, CO, USA). And primers for these biomarkers in the published literatures were also retrieved. The primer sets were synthesized, purified and confirmed by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).
Establishment of singleplex and duplex PCR
2.3
PCR was performed via a CFX96 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Each singleplex and duplex PCR was performed in triplicate, with a final reaction mixture of 20 μL containing 10 μL of 2 × SYBR Green I master mix (Tolo Biotech, Shanghai, China), 2 μL of the DNA template, an appropriate volume of primers and PCR water. The primers were used at a final concentration of 0.2 to 0.5 μM. A two-step amplification protocol was applied, which preceded the initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 58°C for 30 s. Then, a melting curve analysis was used with a ramp speed of 0.1°C/s from 65 to 95°C. The LOD in singleplex and duplex PCR was defined as the lowest amount of HvKP that can produce a melting curve with one or two peaks which distinguished from the background noise. The primers for each target in singleplex real-time PCR were screened on the basis of the LOD and specificity. And the primers used in the duplex PCR melting curve assay were screened via two distinguishable melting peaks appeared or not. In addition, DNA templates extracted from other pathogens were used to evaluate the specificity of the developed singleplex and duplex PCRs.
Detection of HvKP in clinical specimens
2.4
BALB/c female mice, 6–8 weeks old, 16–18 grams in body weight were obtained from Huaxing Experimental Animal Farm (Zhengzhou, China) and quarantined for 5 days before use. HvKP strains 20 K-368 and 19 K-29; cKP strains 19 K-1018, 19 K-1024 and 19 K-1028; and E. coli strain EC23030102, S. typhimurium strain SQ1, S. aureus strain SA23033004, S. suis strain L915 at 10^3^ cfu were used in the intraperitoneal challenge of nine BALB/c mice, respectively. Tail vein blood samples were collected from mice infected with HvKP strains or non-HvKP isolates at the Animal Care Center of Henan Agricultural University, with all operations strictly abiding by the laws and guidelines of China on the care and use of laboratory animals (under experimental license HNND2024030727). A 10 μL sample was mixed with 90 μL of MightyPrep reagent, and incubated at 95°C for 10 min on a block heater. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 2 min, the supernatant was used directly as the DNA template in the developed singleplex and duplex PCRs. Additionally, the string test and sequencing analysis were used as reference methods for these clinical samples.
Results
3
Development of singleplex real-time PCR for biomarkers
3.1
To reduce the testing time, rapid DNA extraction within 12 min was applied in this study, and the extraction yield was confirmed to be comparable to that of the classical mini spin column-based method according to our previous report (21). After initial screening of primer sets on the basis of the detection limit and specificity, primers whose amplicons were in the range of 99 to 413 bp, as shown in Table 1, were selected for use in subsequent real-time PCR assays.
One HvKP strain termed 20 K-368, which harboring biomarker genes iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA, was used in the development of singleplex real-time PCR. The DNA template was extracted from ten-fold serial dilutions of bacterial cultures at concentrations ranging from 1 10^2^ to 1 10^9^ cfu/mL. The linear range of singleplex real-time PCR was identified as the template concentrations where the corresponding Ct values were fitted into a straight line. As presented in Figure 1, standard curves were fitted with the coefficients of correlation (R^2^) greater than 0.99, and the linear ranges were from 10^4^ to 10^9^ cfu/mL for iroB, iucA (with primer iucA-1 being used), peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA (with primer rmpA-1 being used). The efficiency of the developed singleplex real-time PCR method was 96.5% for iroB, 93.8% for iucA, 101.3% for peg-344 and 82.7% for plasmid-borne rmpA. The LOD was determined to be 10^3^ cfu/mL of HvKP, which was 10 cfu/reaction since 10 μL of bacteria and 90 μL of MightyPrep reagent were mixed for DNA preparation. Melting curve analysis revealed that the average melting temperatures (Tm) of these biomarkers were between 76.0 to 86.5°C (Table 1).
Standard curves generated for iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively via the SYBR Green I-based real-time PCR assays. The primers iucA-1 and rmpA-1 were used for the amplification of iucA and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively. PCRs showed efficiencies of 96.5, 93.8, 101.3 and 82.7% for iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively, with all correlation coefficients higher than 0.99.
The reproducibility was evaluated, with coefficients of variation of no more than 1.26% for iroB, no more than 2.04% for iucA, no more than 1.00% for peg-344 and no more than 3.26% for plasmid-borne rmpA, which revealed the good repeatability and reproducibility of the established singleplex real-time PCR assays. Moreover, the specificity of the developed singleplex real-time PCR method was measured by testing 10^6^ cfu/mL 19 K-1018 (cKP), EC23030102 (E. coli), SA23033004 (S. aureus), L915 (S. suis) and SQ1 (S. typhimurium) isolates. As shown in Figure 2, compared with the signal produced by the 20 K-368 (HvKP) strain, no obvious fluorescent signals were recorded for non-HvKP strains during the amplification process, which highlights the high specificity of these assays for the detection of iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA carried by HvKP.
The specificities of the SYBR Green I-based real-time PCR assays for iroB (A), iucA (B), peg-344 (C) and plasmid-borne rmpA (D). An amount of 106 cfu/mL HvKP, cKP, E. coli, S. aureus, S. suis and S. typhimurium were used in this study.
Development of duplex PCR melting curve assays for biomarkers
3.2
In addition to the primers iucA-1 and rmpA-1, singleplex real-time PCR assays were developed with primers iucA-2 and rmpA-2, respectively. Standard curves were fitted with R^2^ values greater than 0.99 when 10^4^ to 10^9^ cfu/mL HvKP strain 20 K-368 was used (Figure 3). Analysis shown that the PCR efficiencies were 75.3% for iucA and 80.7% for plasmid-borne rmpA, which were lower than that of singleplex real-time PCR when the primers iucA-1 and rmpA-1 were used, respectively.
Standard curves plotted for iucA and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively in the SYBR Green I-based real-time PCR assays. The primers iucA-2 and rmpA-2 were used for the amplification of iucA and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively. PCRs showed efficiencies of 75.3 and 80.7% for iucA and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively, with all correlation coefficients higher than 0.99.
As shown in Table 1, the above developed singleplex real-time PCR and melting curve assays revealed two groups of melting peaks with one at approximately 85.0°C for iroB and 86.5–87.5°C for iucA, and the other at approximately 76.0°C for peg-344 and 78.5–80.0°C for plasmid-borne rmpA. The main combination criterion of the primers for duplex PCRs was to ensure that two distinguishable melting peaks could be obtained in the mixed reaction. Therefore, one primer of iroB or iucA in the former group (Tm between 85.0–87.5°C) and the other primer of peg-344 or plasmid-borne rmpA in the latter group (Tm between 76.0–80.0°C) were tried to be mixed in one reaction. After screening, the performance of primer iucA-2 in duplex PCR melting curve assays showed lower detection limits than primer iucA-1 did, as did primer rmpA-2 rather than rmpA-1. In addition, when the primer iroB was mixed with rmpA-1 (or rmpA-2) in one PCR reaction, a melting curve was recorded with only one melting peak, not two different peaks, even when different primer concentrations were attempted, indicating the failure of developing duplex PCR for iroB and plasmid-borne rmpA. Therefore, primers iroB in combination with peg-344, primers iucA-2 in combination with peg-344, and primers iucA-2 in combination with rmpA-2 were selected for the development of duplex PCRs.
To establish the duplex PCR melting curve analysis, the conditions, mainly the primer concentrations were optimized. For singleplex real-time PCR, the concentration was 500 nM for primers iroB, iucA-1, peg-344 and rmpA-1. In duplex PCR for the iroB/peg-344 combination, the concentrations were optimized at 200 nM for primers iroB and peg-344. For the iucA/peg-344 combination, the concentrations were optimized at 300 nM for primer iucA-2 and 200 nM for primer peg-344. And for the iucA/rmpA combination, the optimal primer concentrations were 300 nM for iucA-2 and 500 nM for rmpA-2. However, the mixing of primers iroB and rmpA-2 in duplex PCR was failed to generate a melting curve with two different peaks. The melting curves for the above three duplex PCR assays were shown in Figure 4. Two distinct melting peaks can be seen in a dilution range of 10^4^ to 10^9^ cfu/mL for the iroB (Tm 85.0°C)/peg-344 (Tm 76.0°C) combination and the iucA (Tm 87.5°C)/peg-344 (Tm 76.0°C) combination, and 10^5^ to 10^9^ cfu/mL for the iucA (Tm 87.5°C)/rmpA (Tm 78.5°C) combination. That is, for an unknown sample, if melting peaks appear at 85.0 or 76.0°C in duplex PCR for the iroB/peg-344 combination, it indicates that this sample contains the virulence-related genes iroB or peg-344. The LODs of the duplex PCR melting curve assays for iroB/peg-344, iucA/peg-344 and iucA/rmpA combination were 10^4^, 10^4^ and 10^5^ cfu/mL, respectively, which were 10^2^, 10^2^ and 10^3^ cfu/reaction.
Melting curve analyses for duplex detection of iroB/peg-344 combination (A), iucA/peg-344 combination (B), and iucA/rmpA combination (C). The primers iroB, iucA-2, peg-344 and rmpA-2 were used for SYBR Green I-based amplification and melting analysis of iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively. The distinguishable and sharp peaks obtained for iroB (Tm 85.0°C), iucA (Tm 87.5°C), peg-344 (Tm 76.0°C) and plasmid-borne rmpA (Tm 78.5°C) were shown in the duplex PCRs.
The specificities of the developed duplex PCRs were determined by testing for HvKP-positive, and other Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, and the results were shown in Figure 5. Compared with two clearly distinguishable melting peaks generated from the 10^6^ cfu/mL 20 K-368 (HvKP) strain, no obvious melting peaks were recorded from non-HvKP strains, including 10^6^ cfu/mL 19 K-1018 (cKP), EC23030102 (E. coli), SA23033004 (S. aureus), L915 (S. suis) and SQ1 (S. typhimurium) isolates. These results suggest that the developed duplex PCR melting curve analyses are highly specific for the detection and differentiation of iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA carried by HvKP.
The specificities of melting curve analyses for duplex detection of iroB/peg-344 combination (A), iucA/peg-344 combination (B), and iucA/rmpA combination (C). An amount of 106 cfu/mL HvKP, cKP, E. coli, S. aureus, S. suis and S. typhimurium were used in this study.
Evaluation of singleplex and duplex PCR in clinical samples
3.3
The developed singleplex and duplex PCR assays were used to analyze blood samples from nine infected mice. The results from the developed singleplex and duplex PCR assays revealed that seven out of nine mice were negative for the biomarkers iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA, which were recorded as non-HvKP infection. The other two samples were recorded as HvKP infection. The results of singleplex and duplex PCRs showed that four melting peaks corresponding to genes iroB, iucA, peg-344, plasmid-borne rmpA were produced in the detection of strain 20 K-368 infection; and two melting peaks corresponding to genes iucA, plasmid-borne rmpA were generated in the detection of strain 19 K-29 infection, which depicting the high specificity of developed PCR methods. The typical clinical symptoms observed in these two mice were poor body condition, a ruffled hair coat, ocular swelling and redness. The above PCR results were confirmed by isolation of bacterial pathogens from blood samples, and identification through sequencing and the string test. These detection results supported the reliability of the established singleplex and duplex PCRs for the rapid detection of HvKP.
Discussion
4
Since the emergence of HvKP in the mid-1980s in Asia, serious and life-threatening infections caused by HvKP have been reported in countries and regions around the world in recent years (22–24). As a notorious zoonotic pathogen, HvKP can be isolated not only from humans but also from livestock, pets, wildlife and the environment (9, 25–28). Notably, the convergent K. pneumoniae clones with multidrug-resistant, hypervirulent and highly transmissible profiles are emerging and are now posing unprecedented threats and challenges to public health (29–31). Therefore, methods to identify and surveil the spread of HvKP are urgently needed.
A culture-based string test of K. pneumoniae on a blood-agar plate has been widely used to define HvKP when the viscous string is longer than 5 mm from the surface of the plate (1, 23). However, the correlation between the string test and clinically defined HvKP ranged from 51 to 98%, suggesting that more accurate methods are needed for the identification of HvKP (1). Other methods, such as Galleria mellonella or mouse lethality tests, qualitative plate siderophore production assay, and serum killing assay have been developed for identifying HvKP (11). However, these methods are labor-intensive, time-consuming, costly and are not suitable for the rapid and simple identification of HvKP.
Molecular-based PCR with the advantages of being timely and cost effective has attracted increasing attention (32–37). However, the challenge is which biomarkers can be used to define HvKP. One study revealed that iroB, iucA, peg-344, plasmid-borne rmpA and plasmid-borne rmpA2 are biomarkers for defining HvKP with accuracies ranging from 95 to 97% (12). Further studies revealed that the presence of four or more of the above-mentioned biomarkers can be used to predict one isolate as HvKP with an accuracy of 84%, and the presence of all five biomarkers was more accurate for the definition of HvKP, with an accuracy of 94% (19, 20). Among these five biomarkers, plasmid-borne rmpA (encoding RmpA) and plasmid-borne rmpA2 (encoding RmpA2), with identities of 84.9% for nucleotides (covering 97%) and 81.3% for proteins (covering 46%), regulate capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis in HvKP. When a total of 1767 sequenced K. pneumoniae isolates were analyzed in our laboratory, 26.0% (459/1767) of the isolates carried plasmid-borne rmpA. Further analysis revealed that 98.3% (451/459) of the isolates coharbored both plasmid-borne rmpA and plasmid-borne rmpA2, which suggests that almost all plasmid-borne rmpA-positive isolates were positive for plasmid-borne rmpA2. To reduce the detection cost, plasmid-borne rmpA (other than both plasmid-borne rmpA and plasmid-borne rmpA2) and other biomarkers iroB, iucA and peg-344 were used as the PCR targets for the identification of HvKP in this study.
Recently, singleplex real-time PCR methods for the detection of iucA, peg-344 and rmpA, respectively have been reported, but their LODs and amplification efficiencies have not been reported (16). Since the primers used for rmpA target the consensus sequences of plasmid-borne rmpA, plasmid-borne rmpA2 and chromosome-borne rmpA, the developed singleplex PCR method can detect the above-mentioned three rmpA genes simultaneously. The other one singleplex real-time PCR method was developed for peg-344 with an amplification efficiency of 97.1% (18). The same primer was used in this study for the detection of peg-344, and an efficiency of 101.3% was obtained, confirming the robustness of the reported singleplex real-time PCR assay for peg-344. To reduce the cost and detection time, duplex PCR methods with the capacity to detect two targets simultaneously were developed in this study. Like in previous studies, melting curve analyses were used for the detection of iroB/peg-344, iucA/peg-344 and iucA/rmpA combinations, respectively (38, 39). The LOD of the duplex PCR melting curve assay for iucA/rmpA was not as low as those of the other two combinations. Further studies are needed to improve the LOD. In the study for triplex detection of Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes and S. aureus through melting curve analysis, the SYTO9 dye was applied, and an LOD of 3.7 10^2^ cfu/mL was achieved, which implies that superior fluorescent DNA intercalating dyes, such as EvaGreen and SYTO9, with less PCR inhibition other than SYBR Green I can be applied in subsequent studies (39). Recently, a quadruplex real-time PCR was developed for the detection of iroB, iucA, plasmid-borne rmpA and plasmid-borne rmpA2 with molecular beacon probes labeled with the dyes ROX, VIC, FAM and Cy5, respectively (40). An LOD of 1.5 10^3^ cfu/mL was obtained, which is lower than that reported in this study. In the other one quadruplex real-time PCR, in which the targets include iucA and plasmid-borne rmpA/rmpA2 with molecular beacon probes labeled with the dyes ROX and VIC, respectively, an LOD of 20 cfu/reaction was acquired (41). Through these studies, molecular beacon probes based real-time PCR other than melting curve analysis can be employed to improve the detection limit, but the costs increase. Other methods, such as CRISPR/Cas-based diagnostic tools and recombinase-aided amplification assay have also been developed, and their advantages of ease of use, portability and rapidity are now attracting increasing attention (21, 42–49).
In summary, as shown in Table 2, traditional methods, including in vivo models and phenotypic tests, are commonly used for differentiating HvKP strains from cKP. Among these methods, the murine infection model is recognized as the standard. The median lethal dose (LD_50_) of HvKP is generally between 10–10^6^ cfu after intraperitoneal or subcutaneous challenge, whereas the LD_50_ of cKP is usually greater than 10^7^ cfu. Other methods, such as quantitative mucoviscosity assay, serum killing assay, siderophore production assessment and string test, are based on the hypermucoviscous phenotype of HvKP. However, not all HvKP strains are hypermucoviscous, which limits the accuracy and specificity (60.0–94.0%) of these methods. Additionally, complex operation, high cost and time consuming are the main disadvantages that limit the usage of these traditional tests. PCR-based tests, especially multiplex PCR, which target the biomarkers iroB, iucA, peg-344, plasmid-borne rmpA and rmpA2 of HvKP, are easy to use, accurate, specific and time-saving. The developed PCR methods can detect as few as 2 cfu of HvKP, and the specificity can reach 100%. In addition, CRISPR/Cas-based detection, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and recombinase-aided amplification (RAA) provide alternative methods for rapid and specific detection of HvKP.
In this report, the PCR targets were the HvKP-specific genes iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA. However, when the DNA sequence of iroB in HvKP (NTUH-K2044 isolate) was used as the query sequence for NCBI BLAST, Enterobacter hormaechei and E. coli, which carry this iroB gene with an identity greater than 88.1% (query coverage 100%), were identified. Similarly, the iucA gene in HvKP (NTUH-K2044 isolate) was found in E. coli, with an identity higher than 88.3% (query coverage higher than 94%). These data suggest that for K. pneumoniae strains, the developed singleplex and duplex PCR can be used to differentiate HvKP from cKP. However, for an unknown isolate, bacterial identification of which one belongs to K. pneumoniae or not is essential. Moreover, more hypervirulent strains of other bacterial species require to be collected and used for further specification test of the developed PCRs.
In conclusion, SYBR Green I-based singleplex real-time PCRs for iroB, iucA, peg-344 and plasmid-borne rmpA, respectively were developed with the LOD of 10 cfu/reaction. And duplex PCR melting curve analyses for iroB/peg-344, iucA/peg-344 and iucA/rmpA combinations were performed with LODs of 10^2^, 10^2^ and 10^3^ cfu/reaction, respectively. These methods were found to be reliable and specific for the identification of HvKP. The highlights are (1) rapid SYBR Green I-based singleplex real-time PCRs for HvKP were developed; (2) new duplex PCR melting curve assays for HvKP were established; (3) the detection limit of the singleplex PCRs was 10 cfu; (4) singleplex and duplex tests provide fast, accurate and specific diagnoses of HvKP infection.
Through the initial evaluation of the developed singleplex and duplex PCRs against HvKP, cKP, E. coli, S. aureus, S. suis and S. typhimurium, a specific response was obtained for HvKP, which highlights the high specificity of these PCR methods. Further studies will focus on the collection of more HvKP, cKP and other hypervirulent bacterial strains to evaluate the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of developed PCRs and the development of molecular beacon-based multiplex real-time PCRs for HvKP and other pathogens.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Choby JE Howard-Anderson J Weiss DS. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae – clinical and molecular perspectives. J Intern Med. (2020) 287:283–300. doi: 10.1111/joim.13007, PMID: 31677303 PMC 7057273 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Russo TA Marr CM. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Rev. (2019) 32:e 00001-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-19, PMID: 31092506 PMC 6589860 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Wall K Macori G Koolman L Li F Fanning S. Klebsiella, a hitherto underappreciated zoonotic pathogen of importance to one health: a short review. Zoonoses. (2023) 3:38. doi: 10.15212/ZOONOSES-2023-0016 · doi ↗
- 4Wyres KL Holt KE. Klebsiella pneumoniae as a key trafficker of drug resistance genes from environmental to clinically important bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. (2018) 45:131–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.04.004, PMID: 29723841 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Pu D Zhao J Chang K Zhuo X Cao B. "superbugs" with hypervirulence and carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae: the rise of such emerging nosocomial pathogens in China. Sci Bull. (2023) 68:2658–70. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.09.04037821268 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Liu X Wu Y Zhu Y Jia P Li X Jia X. Emergence of colistin-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (Co R-Hv Kp) in China. Emerg Microbes Infect. (2022) 11:648–61. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2036078, PMID: 35086435 PMC 8896207 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Yao H Qin S Chen S Shen J Du X-D. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Lancet Infect Dis. (2018) 18:25. doi: 10.1016/S 1473-3099(17)30628-X, PMID: 29102518 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Li Y Wang Z Dong H Wang M Qin S Chen S. Emergence of tet(X 4)-positive hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae of food origin in China. LWT. (2023) 173:114280. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114280 · doi ↗
