# Improving synergistic drug combination prediction with signature-based gene expression features in oncology

**Authors:** Mozhgan Mozaffarilegha, Sajjad Gharaghani

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1614758 · Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2025-07-17

## TL;DR

This paper introduces a new method using gene expression signatures to better predict effective drug combinations for cancer treatment.

## Contribution

The novel contribution is the integration of Drug Resistance Signatures (DRS) to improve synergy prediction in drug combinations.

## Key findings

- Models using DRS features outperformed traditional methods across multiple algorithms and datasets.
- The approach showed robustness and generalizability when validated on independent datasets like ALMANAC and DrugCombDB.

## Abstract

Combination therapies play a crucial role in the treatment of complex diseases, such as cancer. They enhance efficacy, minimize resistance, and reduce toxicity by leveraging synergistic effects. However, identifying effective combinations is challenging due to the vast number of possible pairings and the high-priced costs of experimental validation. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models have advanced drug synergy prediction by integrating diverse datasets and modeling the interactions between drugs and cell lines. Despite these advancements, most algorithms primarily rely on drug-specific features, such as chemical structures, with limited incorporation of functional drug information and cellular content features.

We propose a novel approach that integrates Drug Resistance Signatures (DRS) as a biologically informed representation of drug information. This approach provides a more comprehensive framework for identifying effective combination therapies. We evaluated the predictive power of DRS features across various machine learning models (LASSO, Random Forest, AdaBoost, and XGBoost) and the deep learning model SynergyX. We compared their performance with that of conventional drug signatures and chemical structure-based descriptors.

Our results demonstrate that models incorporating DRS features consistently outperform traditional approaches across all evaluated algorithms. Validation on independent datasets, including ALMANAC, O’Neil, OncologyScreen, and DrugCombDB, confirms the robustness and generalizability of the proposed framework.

These findings emphasize the importance of integrating resistance-informed transcriptomic features into computational models. By capturing drug functionality in a biologically relevant context, DRS improves both the accuracy and interpretability of drug synergy prediction, offering a powerful strategy for guiding the discovery of effective combination therapies.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MONDO:0004992)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** DHFR (dihydrofolate reductase) [NCBI Gene 1719] {aka DHFR1, DYR}, TP53 (tumor protein p53) [NCBI Gene 7157] {aka BCC7, BMFS5, LFS1, P53, TRP53}, GRB10 (growth factor receptor bound protein 10) [NCBI Gene 2887] {aka GRB-IR, Grb-10, IRBP, MEG1, RSS}, CYP19A1 (cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A member 1) [NCBI Gene 1588] {aka ARO, ARO1, CPV1, CYAR, CYP19, CYPXIX}, AKT1 (AKT serine/threonine kinase 1) [NCBI Gene 207] {aka AKT, PKB, PKB-ALPHA, PRKBA, RAC, RAC-ALPHA}, SLC1A4 (solute carrier family 1 member 4) [NCBI Gene 6509] {aka ASCT1, SATT, SPATCCM}, ESR1 (estrogen receptor 1) [NCBI Gene 2099] {aka ER, ESR, ESRA, ESTRR, Era, NR3A1}, FAT1 (FAT atypical cadherin 1) [NCBI Gene 2195] {aka CDHF7, CDHR8, FAT, ME5, hFat1}, CSNK2A2 (casein kinase 2 alpha 2) [NCBI Gene 1459] {aka CK2A2, CK2alpha', CSNK2A1}, PIK3CB (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit beta) [NCBI Gene 5291] {aka P110BETA, PI3K, PI3KBETA, PIK3C1}, TRIB3 (tribbles pseudokinase 3) [NCBI Gene 57761] {aka C20orf97, NIPK, SINK, SKIP3, TRB3}, TSC22D3 (TSC22 domain family member 3) [NCBI Gene 1831] {aka DIP, DSIPI, GILZ, TSC-22R}, EIF4EBP1 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1) [NCBI Gene 1978] {aka 4E-BP1, 4EBP1, BP-1, PHAS-I}, EIF4G1 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma 1) [NCBI Gene 1981] {aka EIF-4G1, EIF4F, EIF4G, EIF4GI, P220, PARK18}, EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) [NCBI Gene 1956] {aka ERBB, ERBB1, ERRP, HER1, NISBD2, NNCIS}, MAPKAPK3 (MAPK activated protein kinase 3) [NCBI Gene 7867] {aka 3PK, MAPKAP-K3, MAPKAP3, MAPKAPK-3, MDPT3, MK-3}, EREG (epiregulin) [NCBI Gene 2069] {aka EPR, ER, Ep}, XBP1 (X-box binding protein 1) [NCBI Gene 7494] {aka TREB-5, TREB5, XBP-1, XBP2}
- **Diseases:** cytotoxic (MESH:D064420), Colorectal cancer (MESH:D015179), breast cancer (MESH:D001943), Chronic myeloid leukemia (MESH:D015464), carcinogenesis (MESH:D063646), viral infections (MESH:D014777), DL (MESH:D007859), Pancreatic cancer (MESH:D010190), Hepatocellular carcinoma (MESH:D006528), cancer (MESH:D009369), DRS (MESH:D000069279), Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection (MESH:D012514), DS (MESH:D000081015)
- **Chemicals:** Methotrexate (MESH:D008727), SynergyX (-), Cyclophosphamide (MESH:D003520), Letrozole (MESH:D000077289), nucleotide (MESH:D009711), Anastrozole (MESH:D000077384), Olaparib (MESH:C531550), Lapatinib (MESH:D000077341), Erlotinib (MESH:D000069347)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]
- **Cell lines:** T47D — Homo sapiens (Human), Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0553), MCF7 — Homo sapiens (Human), Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type, Cancer cell line (CVCL_0031)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12310685/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12310685/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12310685/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12310685