# Foot Measurements From Three‐Dimensional Scans: Elinvision 3DST Reliability

**Authors:** Petra J. Jones, Alex V. Rowlands, Melanie J. Davies, David Webb, Clare L. Gillies, Alam Shah

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/jfa2.70070 · Journal of Foot and Ankle Research · 2025-07-30

## TL;DR

The Elinvision 3DST scanner reliably measures basic foot dimensions but shows larger differences for some measurements compared to manual methods.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the reliability of the Elinvision 3DST scanner for foot measurements and compares it to manual methods.

## Key findings

- The 3DST scanner showed excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for most foot measurements.
- Mean absolute differences between scanner and manual measurements were ≤ 0.4 cm for most dimensions but larger for others.
- The scanner is suitable for basic foot dimensions in footwear fit research but less so for orthotics production.

## Abstract

3D foot scanners such as the Elinvision 3DST foot scanner potentially offer a faster, alternative method to traditional plaster casting to produce orthotics or therapeutic footwear.

To assess the reliability of 3DST‐derived foot length, orthogonal ball width, heel width and ball girth. We also compared 3D scanner and manually derived measures.

Repeated measures design.

Two independent raters carried out three scans each of the right foot of 20 healthy participants (10 female) aged 18 years or over (mean age 38 ± 11.4 years) using the 3DST scanner (software v1.6.21.833). Manual foot measurements were taken by an experienced rater using Ritz stick and tape measure.

Intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent for both inter‐rater reliability (0.99–1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97–1.00) and intra‐rater reliability (Rater 1: 0.98–1.00, 95% CI 0.96–1.00; Rater 2: 0.97–1.00, 95% CI 0.94–1.00). Standard error of the mean ranged from 0.1 to 0.4 cm both for scanner and manual measurements. The mean absolute differences between the scanner and manual measurements were ≤ 0.4 cm for foot length, orthogonal ball width (0.2–0.3 cm), ball girth and heel width (0.3–0.4 cm) but larger for foot waist, short heel, ankle circumference and anatomical ball width (0.5–1.1 cm).

The 3DST scanner has potential application for capture of basic foot dimensions in footwear fit research. However, larger differences relative to manual measures for other dimensions limits its potential in orthotics or therapeutic footwear production.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** foot deformities (MESH:D005530), stroke (MESH:D020521), Diabetic (MESH:D003920), diabetes foot ulcer (MESH:D017719), neuropathy (MESH:D009422), oedema (MESH:C536897), type 2 diabetes (MESH:D003924), balance impairment (MESH:D060825), deformities (MESH:D009140), injuries (MESH:D014947), rheumatoid arthritis (MESH:D001172), pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309729/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309729/full.md

## References

38 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309729/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309729