# Combined Intramedullary Nailing and Interfragmentary Screws in Distal Tibial Fractures With Articular Extension

**Authors:** Imad Marzak, Abdullah Zaher, Jaouad Yasser, Noureddine Sekkach

PMC · DOI: 10.7759/cureus.87033 · Cureus · 2025-06-30

## TL;DR

This study shows that combining intramedullary nailing with interfragmentary screws improves outcomes in distal tibial fractures with articular extension.

## Contribution

The study introduces a combined surgical technique that enhances stability and functional recovery in complex tibial fractures.

## Key findings

- 95% of patients achieved acceptable postoperative alignment.
- 88% of patients had AOFAS scores exceeding 86%, indicating excellent functional outcomes.
- Interfragmentary screws improved construct stability and reduced malalignment risk.

## Abstract

The treatment of distal tibial fractures with an articular fracture line remains controversial. Intramedullary nailing allows for the maintenance of good frontal and sagittal alignment, as well as rapid and satisfactory functional recovery. In this retrospective case series, we present our department's experience with 20 patients presenting with AO 43C1 and 43C2 fractures, treated with intramedullary nailing combined with interfragmentary screw fixation over an eight-year period, with a follow-up of 18 months. Postoperative alignment was assessed using radiographic measurements of the anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA) and lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA), immediately and at follow-up. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to report means, standard deviations, and proportions. Acceptable alignment was achieved in 95% of patients. The AOFAS score exceeded 86% in 88% of patients, indicating excellent outcomes. Interfragmentary screw fixation prior to nailing improved construct stability, minimized malalignment risk, and enhanced functional recovery.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** sagittal deformity (MESH:D003398), aseptic (MESH:D008582), deformities of varus (MESH:D060905), Tibial Fractures (MESH:D013978), pain (MESH:D010146), type C fractures (OMIM:211750), Articular fracture (MESH:D057072), Fibular fractures (MESH:D020427), limitation of hindfoot range of motion (MESH:D009041), AO 43C1 (MESH:C535396), fracture of the lateral malleolus (MESH:D064386), malalignment (MESH:D017760), infections (MESH:D007239), sports accidents (MESH:D001265), Road traffic accidents (MESH:D000081084), distal tibia fractures (MESH:D000092524), crushing injuries (MESH:D000071576), valgus (MESH:D060906), type B fractures (MESH:D006509), Gustilo type I (MESH:D006969), Fracture (MESH:D050723), nonunion (MESH:C538144), frontal deformity (MESH:D009140), injuries (MESH:D014947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309624/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309624/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309624/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309624