# Camera trap assessment of bushpig (Potamochoerus larvatus)-domestic animal interactions and implications for pathogen transmission in rural habitats of Madagascar

**Authors:** Rianja Rakotoarivony, Ariane Payne, Daouda Kassie, Steven M. Goodman, Alpha Andriamahefa, Modestine Raliniaina, Raphaël Rakotozandrindrainy, Ferran Jori

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101149 · One Health · 2025-07-19

## TL;DR

This study uses camera traps in Madagascar to assess interactions between bushpigs and domestic animals, finding indirect contacts that could spread pathogens.

## Contribution

First study in Madagascar to analyze spatio-temporal interactions between bushpigs and domestic animals, revealing indirect contact patterns.

## Key findings

- 44 indirect interactions between bushpigs and domestic animals were recorded over 2678 trap nights.
- Critical time windows for potential pathogen transmission were shorter than survival times of pathogens like African swine fever virus.
- Proximity to water sources and protected areas increased the likelihood of bushpig-domestic animal interactions.

## Abstract

In some rural areas of Madagascar, bushpigs (Potamochoerus larvatus) are reported to be attracted to human disturbed habitats and share the same environment with domestic animals, including pigs (Sus scrofa). Such cohabitation can facilitate the transmission of pathogens between bushpigs and other domestic animals. To assess bushpig-domestic animal interactions and their implications for pathogen transmission, 26 camera-traps were deployed for three months around 10 villages in two separate regions of western Madagascar. The camera-traps were positioned at animal attraction sites: trophic resources, resting areas, and water points, and captured 17,804 images. No direct interactions (simultaneous presence) between bushpigs and domestic species were observed after analysis of 2678 trap nights. However, 44 indirect interactions (non-simultaneous presence) were recorded. The median critical time window (CTW), calculated as the time interval between the consecutive presence of bushpigs and some domestic species, was 646 min [34–1412 min]) for pigs, 672 min for cats [range 44–886 min], and 690 min for cattle [range 584–765 min]. Such CTW estimates are shorter than the average survival rate of several infectious pathogens potentially present in the environment, including African swine fever virus, Mycobacterium bovis, and Toxoplasma gondii. Factors such as proximity to water sources and protected areas statistically increased the chances of these interactions. Our research provided novel information on the level of interaction between bushpigs and other domestic animals in anthropized rural areas and which can be used to design and implement strategies to mitigate the risk of pathogen spread at the wildlife/livestock/human interface.

•First-ever study of bushpig-domestic animal spatio-temporal interactions in Madagascar, for which indirect contacts occur.•Frequent indirect interaction between bushpigs, cattle, and cats beyond domestic pigs.•Divergent activity patterns reduce direct bushpig-domestic pig contacts.•Pathogen transmission theoretically possible given environmental survival times.

First-ever study of bushpig-domestic animal spatio-temporal interactions in Madagascar, for which indirect contacts occur.

Frequent indirect interaction between bushpigs, cattle, and cats beyond domestic pigs.

Divergent activity patterns reduce direct bushpig-domestic pig contacts.

Pathogen transmission theoretically possible given environmental survival times.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Potamochoerus larvatus (taxon 273792), Sus scrofa (taxon 9823)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** DP (MESH:D045729), BP (MESH:D007022), Infectious Diseases (MESH:D003141)
- **Chemicals:** CT (-), BP (MESH:C038809)
- **Species:** Mycobacterium tuberculosis variant bovis (biotype) [taxon 1765], Potamochoerus porcus (red river hog, species) [taxon 273791], Numida meleagris (helmeted guineafowl, species) [taxon 8996], Arachis hypogaea (goober, species) [taxon 3818], Ziziphus jujuba (Chinese jujube, species) [taxon 326968], Bos indicus (Indicine cattle, species) [taxon 9915], Sus scrofa (pig, species) [taxon 9823], Felis catus (cat, species) [taxon 9685], Anas platyrhynchos (duck, species) [taxon 8839], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Canis lupus familiaris (dog, subspecies) [taxon 9615], Potamochoerus larvatus (bushpig, species) [taxon 273792], Raphia farinifera (species) [taxon 93338], dothideomycete sp. P (species) [taxon 229544], Butyrivibrio sp. TB (species) [taxon 1520809], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Strychnos spinosa (species) [taxon 99302], Oryza sativa (Asian cultivated rice, species) [taxon 4530], Toxoplasma gondii (species) [taxon 5811], Mangifera indica (mango, species) [taxon 29780], Manihot esculenta (cassava, species) [taxon 3983], African swine fever virus (no rank) [taxon 10497], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031], Suidae (boars, family) [taxon 9821]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309490/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309490/full.md

## References

50 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309490/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12309490