# Providers' and Survivors' Perspectives on Affordability Challenges for Gastrointestinal Cancer Treatment in Two Low Socioeconomic Status States of the Southern United States

## TL;DR

This study explores how affordability challenges affect gastrointestinal cancer care in low-income Southern U.S. states, highlighting the impact of poverty and limited resources on patients and providers.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into affordability barriers for GI cancer care in socioeconomically disadvantaged regions of the U.S., focusing on provider and survivor perspectives.

## Key findings

- Affordability challenges include patients' limited income and competing basic needs.
- Insurance coverage and authorizations often delay and increase the cost of care.
- Community organizations and care adjustments are proposed strategies to improve affordability.

## Abstract

Affordability is an access to care domain contributing to disparities in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer outcomes and care, including surgical care. Affordability challenges for GI cancer care in socioeconomically disadvantaged and diverse states of the southern United States are unknown: this paper addresses this knowledge gap.

We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 32 providers (13 surgeons and 19 other) and 36 survivors (53% colorectal, 19% pancreatic, and 28% esophageal cancer) in Alabama and Mississippi. Questions were about barriers and facilitators to surgical care along five domains, including affordability, that is, the relationship between health care costs, patients' income, health insurance coverage, and the resulting ability to afford care. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using thematic and content analysis.

Themes were about: (1) affordability‐related underlying context, that is, (i) patients' limited means and competing basic needs priorities, (ii) scarcity of quality medical services, and (iii) rural hospitals' limited means; (2) barriers to medical decision‐making, that is, (i) guideline‐concordant care unfeasible due to poverty and (ii) insurance authorizations and coverage delaying and making care costlier; (3) economic burdens from (i) many types of needed expenses and (ii) billing; and (4) strategies to improve affordability, that is, (i) care adjustments to reduce patients' costs, (ii) community organizations' support, and (iii) burdensome access to resources.

Underlying poverty, scarce quality medical services, and restrictive insurance provisions significantly impact medical decision‐making, access to quality and prompt care, and economic and administrative burdens. Future research should quantify the extent of these challenges and identify programs and policies to address them.

This study demonstrates the significant role of affordability‐related challenges in gastrointestinal cancer care, including surgical care, in under‐resourced US states, shedding light on contexts and mechanisms behind existing cancer care and outcome disparities.