‘Controversies on risk factors, diagnosis and treatment of male infertility: Is there an end?’
Ramadan Saleh, Taymour Mostafa, Selahittin Çayan, Rupin Shah, Ashok Agarwal

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSperm and Testicular Function · Reproductive Biology and Fertility · Ovarian function and disorders
Foreword
Infertility remains a significant global health concern, affecting approximately 15% of couples worldwide and often leading to profound psychosocial distress and diminished quality-of-life. Notably, male factor infertility contributes to nearly 50% of all cases. Despite advances in understanding male infertility pathogenesis, diagnostic innovations, and therapeutic developments, several clinical debates persist. Crucially, a substantial proportion of men remain classified as having idiopathic infertility, lacking an identifiable etiology.
This special issue addresses several of the most pressing controversial topics in male infertility, with a focus on lifestyle and environmental factors that affect male fertility. These aspects are explored through several key articles. Rocco et al. examine the impact of obesity on male reproductive health [1], while Kavoussi & Kavoussi analyze the potential effects of mobile phones and laptops on sperm function [2]. Kumar et al. discuss the reproductive consequences of testosterone abuse [3]. A comprehensive review by Bocu et al. further investigates the biological and ecological mechanisms by which environmental exposures affect spermatogenesis and sperm quality, offering potential lifestyle-based interventions [4].
This issue also tackles diagnostic challenges in male infertility, such as male accessory gland infections by Dutta et al. [5] and testicular microlithiasis, a frequently incidental finding during scrotal ultrasound in infertile men by Yilmaz et al. [6]. Additionally, Boeri et al. provide fresh insights into new pathophysiological mechanisms shaping the management of idiopathic male infertility [7].
Further perspectives are presented on specific conditions affecting infertile men, including varicocele cases with normal semen parameters but elevated sperm DNA fragmentation by Almekaty et al. [8], as well as cryptozoospermia and the ongoing debate on optimal sperm retrieval strategies by Japari et al. [9].
Bringing together a diverse, internationally recognized group of authors, this issue presents a multidisciplinary and evidence-based evaluation of current challenges in male infertility. By encouraging collaboration across specialties, these contributions aim to reduce clinical uncertainty, improve treatment approaches, and ultimately enhance reproductive outcomes for infertile men. This collection offers critical insights and serves as a valuable resource for both clinicians and researchers committed to advancing the field of andrology.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Rocco L, Saleh R, Mahmutoglu AM, et al. Obesity and male infertility - a tenuous relationship: facts discerned for the busy clinicians. Arab J Urol. 2025;1–8. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2025.247321939776558 · doi ↗
- 2Kavoussi PK, Kavoussi SK. Do mobile phones and laptop computers really impact sperm? Arab J Urol. 2024;1–6. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2381957 · doi ↗
- 3Kumar N, Kakoti S, Chung E. Pandemic of testosterone abuse: considerations for male fertility. Arab J Urol. 2025;1–7. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2025.250945639776558 · doi ↗
- 4Bocu K, Boeri L, Mahmutoglu AM, et al. Can lifestyle changes significantly improve male fertility: a narrative review? Arab J Urol. 2024;1–11. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2421626 · doi ↗
- 5Dutta S, Bahar F, Calogero AE, et al. Male accessory gland infection (MAGI): over-diagnosed or under-treated in infertile men? Arab J Urol. 2024:1–9. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2445332 · doi ↗
- 6Yilmaz M, Kong CHC, Mostafa T. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of testicular microlithiasis. Arab J Urol. 2024:1–5. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2393936 · doi ↗
- 7Boeri L, Kandil H, Ramsay J. Idiopathic male infertility – what are we missing? Arab J Urol. 2024;1–15. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2381972 · doi ↗
- 8Almekaty K, Ghaith A, Ragab M, et al. Is varicocele repair justified in infertile men with clinical varicocele, normal conventional semen parameters, and elevated sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF)? Arab J Urol. 2025:1–7. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2025.249418039776558 · doi ↗
