# Efficacy and Safety of Combined Topical Lidocaine and Tetracaine Cream for Facial Fractional Laser Resurfacing Compared With Its Reference Product in Chinese Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double‐Blind Phase 3 Study

**Authors:** Wenxin Yu, Zhongling Luo, Yi Zhao, Zhiqi Hu, Aijun Zhang, Yong Li, Juan Tao, Xiaosong Chen, Haiying Wang, Liying Chen, Hanjie Zhu, Xiaoxi Lin

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/jocd.70358 · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology · 2025-07-30

## TL;DR

This study shows that CU-30101, a generic anesthetic cream, works as well as Pliaglis for facial laser treatments in Chinese adults.

## Contribution

Demonstrates the efficacy and safety equivalence of CU-30101 to Pliaglis in a Chinese population for facial fractional laser resurfacing.

## Key findings

- CU-30101 and Pliaglis showed equivalent efficacy with VAS scores within the predefined equivalence margin.
- Both treatments had high participant and investigator satisfaction ratings.
- CU-30101 and Pliaglis exhibited similar safety and tolerability profiles.

## Abstract

As a potentially effective anesthetic, CU‐30101 is comprised of 7% lidocaine and 7% tetracaine and is a generic drug of Pliaglis. This study aimed to investigate the equivalence between CU‐30101 and Pliaglis as topical anesthetics for fractional laser.

This Phase 3 trial recruited Chinese adults scheduled for facial fractional laser resurfacing. Participants were randomized to receive opposite treatment sequences of CU‐30101 and Pliaglis on contralateral sides of the face prior to laser application. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), participant and investigator satisfaction ratings, local tolerability, and safety were assessed.

Two hundred eighty‐four participants completed the study, with mean VAS scores of 35.3 ± 24.51 for CU‐30101 and 37.3 ± 24.17 for Pliaglis. The 95% confidence interval of −3.78 to −0.13 for the VAS difference laid within the predefined equivalence margin of ±4.7, confirming equivalence in efficacy. The results in the per‐protocol set further corroborated the equivalence. Both participants and investigators expressed consistently high satisfaction with CU‐30101 and Pliaglis. Furthermore, both treatments were well tolerated and exhibited favorable safety profiles.

This study demonstrated the equivalent efficacy of CU‐30101 to its reference product, Pliaglis, among Chinese adults undergoing facial fractional laser resurfacing. CU‐30101 showed commendable local tolerability and safety profiles, consistent with those of Pliaglis.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** lidocaine (PubChem CID 3676), tetracaine (PubChem CID 5411), Pliaglis (PubChem CID 11720242)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** Lidocaine (MESH:D008012), Tetracaine (MESH:D013748), CU-30101 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12308782/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12308782/full.md

## References

30 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12308782/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12308782