# Cultivar specific nitrogen and potassium recommendations optimize yield and quality attributes in sugar beet

**Authors:** Sobhi F. Lamlom, Ahmed M. Abdelghany, Aly A. A. El-Banna, Mohamed. M. El-Manhaly, Amr. M. Elsheikh, Noran. A. M. Bassiony, Islam I. Teiba, Gawhara A. El-Sorady, Honglei Ren, Shakeel Ahmad, Taifeng Zhang, Guojun Feng

PMC · DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-10918-x · Scientific Reports · 2025-07-29

## TL;DR

This study shows that using specific nitrogen and potassium levels for each sugar beet cultivar can improve yield, quality, and profitability while reducing fertilizer overuse.

## Contribution

The study provides cultivar-specific fertilizer recommendations based on empirical data from multiple growing seasons.

## Key findings

- Cultivar × treatment interactions significantly affected yield and quality attributes.
- Lower nitrogen and potassium levels improved quality in some cultivars, while higher nitrogen and moderate potassium boosted yield in others.
- Economic analysis identified optimal fertilizer treatments for each cultivar to maximize profitability.

## Abstract

This study aimed to investigate cultivar-specific responses to nitrogen and potassium fertilization in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) to optimize yield, quality attributes, and fertilizer use efficiency. Five sugar beet cultivars (Indira, Carma, Mallak, Melodia, and Shantala) were evaluated under nine fertilization treatments combining three nitrogen and potassium levels (T1 (144 N,0 K); T2 (144 N,60 K); T3 (144 N,120 K); T4 (216 N,0 K); T5 (216 N,60K2);T6 (216 N,120 K); T7 (288 N,0 K); T8 (288 N,60 K); T9 (288 N,120 K)) in a split-plot design over two growing seasons (2020/2021 and 202120/22 ). Significant cultivar × treatment interactions (p < 0.001) were observed across all parameters. Root yield ranged from 55.72 t/ha (Indira) to 83.33 t/ha (Shantala under T2 treatment). Sucrose content varied from 18.10% (Indira) to 18.92% (Mallak), with corresponding purity levels of 79.93% and 76.39%. Principal component analysis revealed distinct cultivar-specific nutrient responses: lower nitrogen and potassium levels (T1 and T2) positively impacted quality attributes in Indira and Carma, while higher nitrogen and moderate potassium combinations (T3 and T6) enhanced yield attributes in Mallak and Shantala. Economic analysis showed optimal profitability with T3 treatment for Indira and Melodia (ROIs of 89.5% and 91.6%), T2 for Carma and Mallak (ROIs of 123.4% and 113.1%), and T1 or T6 for Shantala (ROI of 166%). Hierarchical clustering and correlation analysis identified strong positive relationships between root yield and biological yield (r = 0.94), recoverable sugar yield (r = 0.87), and sugar yield (r = 0.82). These findings provide valuable recommendations for cultivar-specific nutrient management strategies that farmers can implement to optimize both production efficiency and economic returns while reducing environmental impacts from excessive fertilization.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-10918-x.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Beta vulgaris (taxon 161934)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** SLM (MESH:D007787), deficiency (MESH:D007153), nitrogen (MESH:D007222), nitrogen deprivation (MESH:D012892)
- **Chemicals:** sodium hypochlorite (MESH:D012973), Na (MESH:D012964), T3 (MESH:D014284), K2SO4 (MESH:C031512), K (MESH:D011188), Sugar (MESH:D000073893), nitrate (MESH:D009566), ECe (-), chlorophyll (MESH:D002734), Urea (MESH:D014508), starch (MESH:D013213), NO3- (MESH:C038619), Sucrose (MESH:D013395), K2O (MESH:C068440), oils (MESH:D009821), phosphorus (MESH:D010758), N (MESH:D009584), water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris (field beet, subspecies) [taxon 3555], Beta vulgaris (beet, species) [taxon 161934]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12307683/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12307683/full.md

## References

13 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12307683/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12307683