# Usability of a hearing test mobile app across generations

**Authors:** Małgorzata Pastucha, Elżbieta Gos, Krzysztof Kochanek, Henryk Skarżyński, Wieslaw Wiktor Jedrzejczak, Gauri Mankekar, Gauri Mankekar, Gauri Mankekar

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327726 · PLOS One · 2025-07-29

## TL;DR

A hearing test mobile app was tested across age groups, showing promise for younger users but usability challenges for older adults.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the usability of a hearing test app across generations and identifies age-related usability barriers.

## Key findings

- Older participants reported higher difficulty with app usability, particularly in installation and result interpretation.
- Younger users (16–39 years) completed the test independently more often than older age groups.
- All age groups preferred conventional hearing tests over app-based assessments, though younger users were more open to apps.

## Abstract

Traditional diagnostic methods of hearing assessment, such as pure tone audiometry, may not be equally accessible to everyone due to geographical or mobility limitations. Utilizing a mobile application (app) for self-assessment of hearing is a promising alternative. However, the effectiveness of apps, as well as their usability across different age groups, remains largely unexplored. The objective of the present study was to assess, across different age groups, the usability of the “Hearing Test” app which allows self-testing of hearing on a mobile phone.

The study was conducted on 77 participants from three age groups (16–39 years, 40–59 years, 60 years and older) who self-tested their hearing thresholds using the mobile app and who later underwent pure tone audiometry with an audiologist. The usability of the app was evaluated using a questionnaire based on the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS), which was complemented by participant observation and interview.

The app generally yielded results comparable to pure tone audiometry. However, older age groups tended to report higher levels of difficulty across several usability dimensions. Specifically, the oldest group rated the app lower in terms of functionality (M = 2.30; SD = 1.27) and engagement-customization (M = 2.11; SD = 1.28). For the oldest participants, the greatest difficulties related to installation (48%), and interpretation of results (26%). None of the participants aged 60 or older were able to complete the test independently, in contrast to 67% of the youngest participants and 28% of the middle-aged who did not require assistance. All age groups expressed a preference for a conventional hearing test over an app-based assessment, although the youngest group showed the greatest openness to using mobile apps.

The “Hearing Test” app has demonstrated its potential as a tool for initial hearing assessment, particularly among younger users. However, older individuals often encounter difficulties with installation, interpretation of results, and overall usability. Adapting the interface to meet the specific needs of older users, including user-friendly tutorials and clear presentation of results, is crucial for enhancing its usability.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MESH:D001943), vertigo (MESH:D014717), asymmetrical hearing (OMIM:616697), Tinnitus (MESH:D014012), HL (MESH:D034381), COVID 19 (MESH:D000086382), pain (MESH:D010146), conductive or sensorineural hearing loss (MESH:D006319)
- **Chemicals:** PONE-D-25-24910R1 (-), blood glucose (MESH:D001786)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12306789/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12306789/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12306789/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12306789