# Health policy challenges in Lebanon’s healthcare system: on sexual and reproductive health and rights

## TL;DR

Lebanon's healthcare system struggles to address sexual and reproductive health and rights despite international commitments and ongoing challenges.

## Contribution

The paper highlights systemic barriers and policy gaps in Lebanon's SRHR and advocates for inclusive healthcare reform.

## Key findings

- Lebanon's SRHR policies are hindered by political fragmentation and societal conservatism.
- Marginalized groups face significant barriers in accessing essential SRHR services.
- Lebanon's 'Vision 2030' health strategy lacks sufficient focus on SRHR integration.

## Abstract

Lebanon’s healthcare system has demonstrated remarkable resilience amidst ongoing political and economic turbulence. Yet, the critical domain of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) remains underserved. This commentary analyses the systemic barriers, policy deficiencies, and urgent needs that shape SRHR within Lebanon's healthcare landscape. Despite the country’s commitments to international frameworks like the ICPD and CEDAW, SRHR policies are hindered by political fragmentation, societal conservatism, and insufficient prioritisation. These challenges translate into inadequate and inconsistent family planning services, a lack of comprehensive sexuality education, inadequate maternal healthcare, and significant obstacles in accessing essential services, especially for marginalised communities such as refugees, women, and youth. Lebanon’s “Vision 2030” health strategy, while ambitious in scope, offers only limited engagement with SRHR, which leaves systemic inequities unaddressed. Renewed episodes of violence and displacement further strain the healthcare system and deepen the disparities faced by vulnerable groups. The reliance on temporary, NGO-led initiatives to fill gaps in service provision underscores a broader policy paralysis and inconsistent resource allocation, which together prevent the sustainable integration of SRHR into national health frameworks. This commentary calls for a gender-sensitive, inclusive healthcare policy that positions SRHR as a foundational pillar of public health, gender justice, and social equity. Achieving this requires concerted efforts among government agencies, NGOs, and international partners to overhaul existing frameworks and address structural barriers.