The HEALERS: a patient, community, and stakeholder advisory board focus group series to refine a novel virtual world-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention and clinical trial
Helayna Abraham, Grace Patrice Anyetei-Anum, Ashton Krogman, Donald Clark, Melvin Echols, Michael E. Hall, Karen Hodgman, Brian Kaihoi, Stephen Kopecky, Shawn Leth, Shaista Malik, Jill Marsteller, Lena Mathews, Robert Scales, Phillip Schulte, Adam Shultz, Julie Becker

TL;DR
This paper describes how feedback from a diverse advisory board helped refine a virtual cardiac rehab program and its clinical trial design to better meet patient needs.
Contribution
A novel approach using patient and community feedback to iteratively refine a virtual world-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention and its trial protocol.
Findings
Participants emphasized the importance of safety and social support in the virtual rehab program.
Effective recruitment strategies included communication improvements and recruitment video suggestions.
Retention tools like reminders and incentives were identified as crucial for participant engagement.
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a widely underutilized secondary cardiovascular disease prevention strategy, due to a variety of barriers to participation that disproportionately impact women, minoritized racial and ethnic groups, and patients with low socioeconomic status. Destination Cardiac Rehab, a virtual world-based CR (VWCR) program designed by our team in collaboration with patients and community members to mitigate the barriers to CR participation, has demonstrated feasibility and acceptability. In anticipation of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to further validate the intervention, this qualitative descriptive analysis provides insights garnered from a patient/community/stakeholder-advisory board (PCS-AB, HEALERS) focus group series, convened to inform iterative refinements to a RCT protocol. HEALERS participated in five 90-min virtual focus group sessions to provide…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiac Health and Mental Health · Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
