Secondary analysis of the Game of Stones trial for men with obesity: examining moderator effects and exploratory outcomes
Stephan U. Dombrowski, Pat Hoddinott, Lisa Macaulay, Catriona O'Dolan, James Swingler, Seonaidh Cotton, Alison Avenell, Abraham M. Getaneh, Cindy Gray, Kate Hunt, Frank Kee, Alice MacLean, Michelle C. McKinley, Claire Torrens, Katrina Turner, Marjon van der Pol, Graeme MacLennan

TL;DR
This study examined if text messages with or without financial incentives helped men with obesity lose weight, finding no differences across socioeconomic or health groups.
Contribution
The study provides evidence that the intervention's effectiveness is consistent across diverse subgroups.
Findings
No socioeconomic or health factors moderated the intervention's effectiveness.
The texts with incentives group showed higher engagement in weight-management strategies and confidence.
Interventions did not lead to differences in health behaviors across groups.
Abstract
The objective was to explore whether socioeconomic, health, and behavioral characteristics moderate the effectiveness of a text message intervention with or without financial incentives versus a control group and to examine differences in exploratory outcomes. This three‐group randomized trial including 585 men with obesity compared daily automated behavioral text messages alongside financial incentives, text messages alone, and a waiting list control for 12 months. Moderator analyses examined percentage weight change after 12 months for 9 socioeconomic and 11 health factors. Exploratory outcomes included the following: self‐reported physical activity, sedentary behavior, smoking and alcohol behaviors, engagement in 15 weight‐management strategies, and weight‐management–related confidence. No moderator effects were found by any factors for either comparison versus control. There were…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
