Determination of the optimal ejaculate concentration of a buffalo bull for successful semen cryopreservation
Krishna Bansal, Dinesh Jhamb, Usha Yadav, Mamta Meel, Akanksha Gupta, Renu Bala, Meenakshi Virmani, Meeti Punetha, Dharmendra Kumar, Pradeep Kumar

TL;DR
This study determines the minimum sperm concentration needed for successful buffalo bull semen cryopreservation and evaluates post-thaw sperm quality.
Contribution
Identifies a new minimum sperm concentration threshold for buffalo semen cryopreservation and evaluates its impact on post-thaw sperm quality.
Findings
9.96% of buffalo ejaculates had sperm concentration below 500 million/mL, with 48% still suitable for cryopreservation.
Ejaculates with 1,101–1,201 million/mL sperm produced the most doses (8.79%).
Ejaculates with <300 million/mL sperm showed significantly worse post-thaw sperm quality despite initial suitability.
Abstract
For cattle bulls, only ejaculates with a sperm concentration of 500 million/mL or higher are selected for sperm cryopreservation. There is no established ejaculate’s minimum sperm concentration threshold for buffalo semen cryopreservation. Therefore, the first objective of the study was to determine the percentage of ejaculates of buffalo bulls having concentrations lower than 500 million/mL, the percentage of ejaculates suitable for cryopreservation across different concentrations of donated ejaculates, and to estimate the impact of ejaculate concentrations on the production of semen doses. The second objective was to evaluate the post-thaw sperm quality of ejaculates that initially met the criteria for cryopreservation. After analyzing 5,347 ejaculates from 31 buffalo bulls, it was found that 9.96% of the buffalo semen ejaculates had a sperm concentration of less than 500 million/mL.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSperm and Testicular Function · Reproductive Biology and Fertility · Male Reproductive Health Studies
