# Usefulness of A Portal Vein Stent for Sinistral Portal Hypertension: A Case Report

## TL;DR

A portal vein stent effectively treated sinistral portal hypertension in a patient after pancreatoduodenectomy.

## Contribution

Demonstrates the successful use of PV stenting for SPH following PD with SV obstruction.

## Key findings

- PV stenting improved esophageal varices in a patient with SPH after PD.
- CTAP confirmed hemodynamic communication before stent placement.
- The patient had no complications and was discharged after 4 days.

## Abstract

Portal vein (PV) and splenic vein (SV) stenosis are known complications of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and often lead to portal hypertension. PV stenosis extending to the SV confluence can result in sinistral portal hypertension (SPH), characterized by gastrointestinal varices and splenomegaly in the presence of normal liver function. There is no standardized treatment strategy for SPH following PD.

A 42-year-old female underwent robot-assisted PD for a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor without immediate PV complications. Postoperatively, the patient experienced fluid retention; however, this did not pose a problem, and no therapeutic intervention was necessary. Two months later, imaging revealed PV stenosis and SV obstruction. Eleven months after surgery, the patient presented with melena, and imaging confirmed the presence of gastroesophageal varices with severe PV stenosis and complete SV obstruction. Endoscopic variceal ligation was performed, and the hemodynamic status of the portal system was assessed using computed tomography during arterial portography (CTAP). CTAP showed communication between the superior mesenteric vein and the SV via the middle colic vein. Therefore, we decided to perform PV stenting. The stent was successfully placed, resulting in a significant improvement in the esophageal varices. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 4, receiving anticoagulant therapy, with no further complications.

This case demonstrates the efficacy of PV stenting after careful hemodynamic assessment in a patient who developed SPH due to PV stenosis and SV obstruction following PD.