# Analysing plate fixation of a comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna in relation to the elbow joint: a finite element study

## TL;DR

This study uses a detailed computer model to compare different screw setups for fixing a complex elbow fracture, finding that some screws can be omitted without compromising stability.

## Contribution

A novel finite element model was developed to evaluate screw configurations for proximal ulna fractures, offering insights into optimal fixation strategies.

## Key findings

- All tested screw configurations provided adequate stability under normal loading conditions.
- Omitting certain proximal screws increased stress concentrations and risk of complications.
- Securing the coronoid and apical fragments is critical to prevent compromised healing.

## Abstract

This study investigated the biomechanical behavior of four different screw configurations used to fix comminuted proximal ulna fractures with a locking compression plate (LCP), via a detailed finite element model based on realistic anatomical geometry. The model incorporated realistic anatomical geometry including both cortical and cancellous bone, soft tissue constraints, and loading conditions representing the physiological self-weight of the forearm, with the humerus fixed at its proximal end. The stress distribution on the plate, strain intensity within the bone tissue, and interfragmentary motion (IFM) between fracture fragments were evaluated for each configuration. The results indicate that all the tested configurations provide adequate stability under normal loading conditions, with no risk of material failure. However, excessive stress concentrations were observed in specific screw regions depending on the configuration, particularly when proximal screws anchoring the olecranon (e.g. screws 2 and 3 in Variant 3) were omitted. Strain analysis revealed moderate physiological bone loading across variants, whereas IFM assessment highlighted the importance of securing the coronoid and apical fragments to prevent compromised healing. These findings suggest that a specific reductions in osteosynthetic material, such as omitting certain diaphyseal screws while maintaining crucial olecranon and coronoid fixation, may provide sufficient fracture stabilisation under the modelled conditions, potentially minimising implant-related complications. This modelling approach offers a valuable tool for preclinical assessment of osteosynthesis strategies and supports future comparative research on fixation methods with varying biomechanical properties.