# Relationship Between Hospital Team Segregation Index, Heart Failure, and Ischemic Heart Disease

**Authors:** Adedoyin Johnson, Shannon M. Knapp, Hunter Mwansa, Janina Quintero Bisonó, Ikeoluwapo Kendra Bolakale-Rufai, Wanda Moore, Ekow Yankah, Ryan Yee, Dalancee Trabue, Francesca Williamson, Natalie Pool, Megan Hebdon, Quinn Capers, Courtland Blount, Nia Kimbrough, Denee Johnson, Jalynn Evans, Brandi Foree, Rev Anastasia Holman, David Brown, Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds, Brahmajee Nallamothu, John Hollingsworth, Khadijah Breathett

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101988 · JACC: Advances · 2025-07-18

## TL;DR

This study explores how hospital team segregation affects heart disease outcomes for Black and White patients, finding racial disparities in care and survival.

## Contribution

The study introduces the hospital segregation index as a novel metric to assess structural racism's impact on cardiovascular care outcomes.

## Key findings

- Black patients with heart failure had lower odds of receiving cardiologist care compared to White patients.
- Black patients with ischemic heart disease had a 20% higher readmission risk at high segregation index hospitals if not seen by cardiologists.
- Black patients seen by cardiologists at low segregation index hospitals had better 1-year survival odds than White patients.

## Abstract

The extent of structural racism in cardiovascular care is not well studied.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospital segregation index (SI) (degree of dissimilarity between teams caring for Black vs White patients) is associated with receipt of a cardiologist’s care, readmission up to 30 days, and 1-year survival for Black vs White patients admitted with heart failure (HF) or ischemic heart disease (IHD).

Using Optum’s Clinformatics Data Mart, we examined the effect of hospital SI on Black and White patients admitted with primary diagnoses of HF or IHD from 2010 to 2018 using mixed effects models. Hospitals were grouped by SI tertile.

Overall, 119,272 patients (29.4% Black, 70.6% White) with HF and 183,165 patients (17.9% Black and 82.1% White) with IHD were analyzed. Across SI tertiles, Black patients with HF had lower odds of receiving a cardiologist’s care compared to White patients. Across SI tertiles and cardiology care, there was no difference in the hazard of readmission by race, and odds of 1-year survival were higher for Black patients. Among patients with IHD, there was no difference in odds of receiving cardiology care between races across SI tertiles. Black patients not seen by cardiologists had 20% higher hazard of readmission at high SI hospitals (HR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.00-1.44). Odds of 1-year survival were higher for Black patients (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04-1.17) seen by cardiologists in low SI hospitals.

Among Black vs White patients, HF outcomes did not vary by SI tertiles. However, in IHD, SI impacted Black patients’ risk of readmission and survival.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** heart failure (MONDO:0005252), ischemic heart disease (MONDO:0024644)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** HF (MESH:D006333), IHD (MESH:D017202)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12301724/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12301724/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12301724/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12301724