Sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis and preterm birth in pregnant people living with HIV: A population-based cohort study
Jeffrey Man Hay Wong, Gal Av-Gay, Terry Lee, Arezou Azampanah, Chelsea Elwood, Julie van Schalkwyk, Laura Sauvé, Deborah Money

TL;DR
Pregnant people with HIV who have sexually transmitted infections or bacterial vaginosis are at higher risk of preterm birth.
Contribution
This study identifies STIBV as an independent risk factor for preterm birth in pregnant people living with HIV.
Findings
11% of pregnancies in PLWH had STIBV, with a 37% preterm birth rate compared to 17% without STIBV.
STIBV remained an independent risk factor for preterm birth after adjusting for multiple variables.
Abstract
While individual sexually transmitted infections are linked with preterm births, their synergistic impact among pregnant people living with HIV (PLWH) remain unclear. We aimed to identify the impact of antenatal sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis on preterm birth in PLWH. We completed a population-based cohort study using the British Columbia Perinatal HIV Surveillance Database, capturing all births in PLWH from January 1997 to December 2022. Univariate risk factors for preterm birth were identified using chi-squared tests, Fisher’s exact tests and t-tests, followed by a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of 578 singleton pregnancies, 111 (19.2%) had preterm births, of which 34 (31%) delivered before 34 weeks gestational age. In our population, 11% were identified with a sexually transmitted infection or bacterial vaginosis (STIBV) in pregnancy. The…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4- —Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Researchhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100002879
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive tract infections research · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Introduction
While many sexually transmitted and bloodborne infections are each correlated with preterm births,^1–3^ the synergetic impacts of co-infections in pregnant people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remain unclear. Over 20% of people living with HIV (PLWH) are found to have a co-infection with a genital tract infection in pregnancy.^4,5^ In the general population, sexually transmitted infections such as Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are associated with preterm birth, premature rupture of membranes, postpartum infections, and neonatal infections such as pneumonia and ophthalmitis.^6–8^ In pregnant PLWH, co-infections with CT and NG have been associated with an increased risk of perinatal HIV transmission.^9,10^
In a recent meta-analysis, PLWH are at an increased risk of preterm birth compared to the general population.^ 11 ^ When examining only PLWH on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the elevated risk of preterm birth remains persistent.^ 12 ^ Factors that place PLWH at risk of preterm birth include co-infection with Hepatitis C, concurrent substance use, poor HIV control (lower CD4 count and unsuppressed viral load), and anemia.^13,14^ In the non-HIV population, meta-analyses have also shown a clear association between preterm birth and antenatal diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoea, Trichomonas vaginalis (TV), and bacterial vaginosis.^2,15,16^ However, in PLWH, only two studies examined CT and NG infections’ impact on preterm birth with conflicting results^4,5^ – while only one study studied the perinatal implications of TV.^ 5 ^
We conducted this study to understand our rates of sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis (STIBV) in pregnant PLWH and examine their impact on preterm birth rates in British Columbia, Canada.
Methods
Study population
We completed a prospective population-based cohort study on all pregnancies in PLWH in British Columbia, Canada. Our analysis was completed using the British Columbia HIV Perinatal Database, established in 1994. Singleton pregnancies from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2022 were included in the analysis. Pregnancies beyond 1997 reflect a cohort where the use of antiretroviral therapy was standard in pregnancy. Exclusion criteria included multiple gestation pregnancies, spontaneous abortions before 20 weeks gestational age, therapeutic abortions, maternal deaths, and unknown gestational age at delivery. The conception and use of the database were prospectively approved by the University of British Columbia Children’s and Women’s Research Ethics Board (approval number H10-01186) and was supported through infrastructure from the Women’s Health Research Institute and BC Women’s Hospital and Health Centre. The British Columbia HIV Perinatal Database was established as part of the provincial surveillance program, where our research ethics board deemed that individual consent was not required.
Data collection
All individuals living with HIV who become pregnant are followed directly or indirectly through the provincial perinatal HIV service and entered as part of provincial surveillance. Data, including early infant outcome data, is inputted routinely into a Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database at the end of the pregnancy. Data sources include the British Columbia Antenatal Record, the provincial laboratory results repository, hospital records, and clinicians’ notes. Lack of antiretroviral therapy at delivery is defined as no antiretroviral therapy prescribed during the entire pregnancy. Hepatitis C diagnosis was determined by a positive Hepatitis C virus RNA (if available). If Hepatitis C IgG antibody is positive but RNA testing is unavailable, this would be also be determined as a Hepatitis C diagnosis. Diagnoses of bacterial vaginosis was determined by Nugent score > 6. For sexually transmitted and bloodborne infections, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoaea and Trichomonas vaginalis infections were determined by positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Hepatitis B infections were deemed positive with a detectable Hepatitis B viral DNA (if available). If Hepatitis B DNA results were not available, a Hepatitis B diagnosis only based on HBsAg testing. Preterm births were defined as deliveries between 20+0 and 36 + 6 weeks gestational age. Information on the specific laboratory kits for each sexually transmitted and bloodborne infection is not available.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.0 (Auckland, New Zealand). From a coding perspective, the combined STIBV variable represents at least one perinatal diagnosis of CT, NG, TV, and bacterial vaginosis, all established as risk factors for preterm deliveries in the general obstetrical population. The chi-squared and Fisher’s exact tests were used to complete univariate analyses on categorical variables. T-tests were conducted for continuous variables to determine statistical significance differences between preterm and term births. A multivariate logistic regression model was built to examine the association between STIBV and preterm deliveries while adjusting for risk modifiers with p-value < .1 in the univariate analysis, as well as clinically significant risk factors that have a p-value > .1. Due to significant number of missing data for body mass index, this was not included in the regression model. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used as the cut‐off for two‐sided significance.
Results
Our provincial surveillance program included 889 pregnancies since its inception. After excluding pregnancies before 1997 (n = 127), therapeutic or spontaneous abortions (n = 127), multifetal pregnancies (n = 28), maternal deaths (n = 7), and unknown gestational age (n = 22), we analyzed 578 singleton pregnancies. Our preterm delivery rate in the cohort was 19.2% (n = 111), where 34 (31% of preterm births) were before 34 weeks gestational age.
Demographics and HIV-specific characteristics in our study population are described in Table 1. In our cohort, risk modifiers associated with preterm birth include ethnicity (p = .0002), substance use in pregnancy (p = .0004), failure to achieve virologic suppression (p < .0001), lack of antiretroviral therapy at delivery (p < .0001), and a delivery CD4 count < 350 cells/mm^3^ (p = .0003). The specific antiretroviral regimen taken in pregnancy was not correlated with preterm birth.Table 1.Demographics of included cohort of people living with HIV in British Columbia.Cohort total (n = 578)Term birth (n = 467)Preterm birth (n = 111)Odds ratio (95% CI)p-valuen (% of total)n (rate of term birth)n (rate of preterm birth)Age31 ± 631 ± 50.99 (0.96, 1.03).68BMI<18.54 (2%)4 (100%)0 (0%)N/A.03318.5–24.987 (44%)65 (75%)22 (25%)125–3061 (30%)51 (84%)10 (16%)0.65 (0.33–1.27)>3048 (24%)45 (94%)3 (6%)0.25 (0.08–0.78)EthnicityBlack125 (22%)115 (92%)10 (8%)1.0002Indigenous170 (29%)122 (72%)48 (28%)3.53 (1.86–6.7)White193 (33%)157 (81%)36 (19%)2.33 (1.2–4.53)Other90 (16%)73 (81%)17 (19%)2.36 (1.13–4.91)Gravidity189 (16%)71 (80%)18 (20%)1.652123 (22%)97 (79%)26 (21%)1.05 (0.61–1.79)3+356 (63%)293 (82%)63 (18%)0.88 (0.55–1.4)Parity0172 (31%)133 (83%)29 (17%)1.551152 (27%)118 (78%)34 (22%)1.33 (0.85–2.07)2111 (20%)93 (84%)18 (16%)0.96 (0.56–1.65)3+127 (23%)103 (81%)24 (19%)1.12 (0.69–1.83)Previous preterm birthYes83 (15%)61 (73%)22 (27%)1.53 (1.02–2.3).066No479 (85%)396 (83%)83 (17%)1Gestational diabetesYes54 (10%)44 (81%)10 (19%)1.05 (0.58–1.89).85No498 (90%)410 (82%)88 (18%)1Hypertensive disorder of pregnancyYes31 (6%)25 (81%)6 (19%)1.06 (0.5–2.22).81No524 (94%)428 (82%)96 (18%)1Substance use in pregnancyYes118 (20%)81 (69%)37 (31%)1.95 (1.39–2.74).0004No460 (80%)386 (84%)74 (16%)1Combination ART regimen nearest deliveryMono/Dual/ Triple NRTI25 (5%)22 (81%)3 (12%)0.68 (0.19–2.46).95NNRTI90 (18%)74 (82%)16 (18%)1.01 (0.43–2.36)Protease inhibitors (PI)121 (24%)103 (85%)18 (15%)0.84 (0.36–1.96)Boosted PI241 (47%)198 (82%)43 (18%)1.01 (0.47–2.19)Integrase inhibitors34 (6%)28 (82%)6 (18%)1Other2 (0.3%)2 (100%)0 (0%)0 (0 - NaN )On antiretroviral therapy at delivery?Yes535 (93%)442 (83%)93 (17%)0.41 (0.27–0.60).0003No42 (7%)24 (57%)18 (43%)1Time on ART prior to delivery<12 weeks169 (29%)114 (67%)55 (33%)1<.0001>12 weeks409 (71%)353 (86%)56 (14%)0.42 (0.30–0.58)VL suppressed at deliveryYes425 (80%)365 (86%)60 (14%)0.42 (0.29–0.59)<.0001No109 (20%)72 (66%)37 (34%)1CD4 count at delivery<350123 (24%)86 (70%)37 (30%)1.0003>350382 (76%)326 (85%)56 (15%)0.49 (0.34–0.7)
Bacterial vaginosis, sexually transmitted and bloodborne infections
In our population, baseline incidence of co-infections and vaginal dysbiosis is as follows: Hepatitis B (n = 14; 2.5%), Hepatitis C (n = 83; 14.4%), Treponema pallidum (n = 5; 0.9%), CT (n = 20; 3.4%), NG (n = 4; 0.7%), TV (n = 22; 3.8%), and BV (n = 42; 7.3%). Table 2 compares the preterm birth rate between PLWH who had a co-infection or concurrent bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy compared to those who did not. A statistically significant difference in preterm birth was found in those who have concurrent Hepatitis C (OR: 2.42; 95% CI (1.72–3.39); p < .0001), an antenatal diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis (OR 2.17; 95% CI (1.23–3.81); p = .036), Trichomonas vaginalis (OR: 2.78; 95% CI (1.77–4.38); p = .0009) and bacterial vaginosis (OR: 2.15; 95% CI (1.40–3.29); p = .003). In amalgamating genital tract infections and bacterial vaginosis (i.e. STIBV), the preterm birth rate in PLWH with STIBV was 37% compared to 17% in those without STIBV (OR: 2.18; 95% CI (1.50–3.16); p = .0003). Risk factors for STIBV diagnosis in pregnancy include ethnicity (p < .001), unsuppressed viral load (p = .047), substance use in pregnancy (p < .001) and hepatitis C infection in pregnancy (p = .022) (Table 3). Treatment of the sexually transmitted infection before delivery occurred in 65% (13/20) of CT cases, 75% (3/4) of NG cases, 73% (16/22) of TV cases, and 55% (23/42) of BV cases. Untreated patients represented peripartum diagnoses, which did not have an opportunity for treatment. When comparing treated with untreated cases of STIBV, there are no differences in preterm births (40% vs 33%; p = .579).Table 2.Sexually transmitted, bloodborne infections and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant people living with HIV.Cohort total (n = 578)Term birth (n = 467)Preterm birth (n = 111)Odds ratio (95% CI)p-valuen (% of total)n (rate of term birth)n (rate of preterm birth)SyphilisYes5 (1%)3 (60%)2 (40%)2.1 (0.71–6.23).25No573 (99%)464 (81%)109 (19%)1Hepatitis BYes14 (2%)10 (71%)4 (29%)1.51 (0.65–3.51).32No564 (98%)457 (81%)107 (19%)1Hepatitis CYes83 (14%)51 (61%)32 (39%)2.42 (1.72–3.39)<.0001No495 (86%)416 (84%)79 (16%)1GonorrhoeaYes4 (1%)2 (50%)2 (50%)2.63 (0.97–7.12).17No574 (99%)465 (81%)109 (19%)1ChlamydiaYes20 (3%)12 (60%)8 (40%)2.17 (1.23–3.81).036No558 (97%)455 (81%)103 (18%)1TrichomonasYes22 (4%)11 (50%)11 (50%)2.78 (1.77–4.38).0009No556 (96%)456 (80%)100 (18%)1Bacterial vaginosisYes42 (7%)26 (62%)16 (38%)2.15 (1.40–3.29).003No536 (93%)441 (82%)95 (18%)1STIBVYes65 (11%)41 (64%)24 (37%)2.18 (1.5–3.16).0003No513 (89%)426 (83%)87 (17%)1Table 3.Risk modifiers associated with antenatal diagnosis of STIBV in pregnant people living with HIV.Concurrent STIBV in pregnancy n = 65No STIBV in pregnancyn = 513Odds ratio (95% CI)p-valueAge30.5 ± 5.431.5 ± 5.60.97 (0.92, 1.01).16EthnicityBlack9 (14%)116 (23%)1<.001Indigenous33 (51%)137 (26%)3.10 (1.43–6.75)White18 (28%)175 (34%)1.32 (0.58–3.05)Other5 (8%)85 (17%)0.76 (0.25–2.34)Viral load suppressed at deliveryYes44 (70%)381 (81%)0.55 (0.31–0.98).047No19 (30%)90 (19%)1CD4 count at delivery<35020 (32%)103 (23%)1.158>35043 (68%)339 (77%)0.65 (0.37–1.16)Substance use in pregnancyYes27 (41%)80 (16%)7.62 (4.40–13.18)<.001No38 (58%)433 (84%)1Hepatitis C infectionYes16 (25%)67 (13%)2.17 (1.17–4.04).022No49 (75%)446 (87%)1
Multivariate analyses of PLWH and risk of preterm birth
After adjusting for ethnicity, history of preterm birth, perinatal substance use, concurrent Hepatitis C, protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapies, CD4 count and viral suppression at delivery (Table 4), STIBV in pregnancy remains an independent risk factor (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.04–4.19; p = .039).Table 4.Multivariate analysis for preterm birth in people living with HIV.Risk modifiersOdds ratio (95% CI)p-valueSexually transmitted infections or bacterial vaginosis2.09 (1.04, 4.19).039Unsuppressed viral load at delivery2.04 (1.08, 3.84).028Ethnicity Black1 Indigenous2.56 (0.99, 6.65).054 White2.90 (1.16, 7.26).023 Other ethnicities2.33 (0.81, 6.73).118History of preterm deliveries1.51 (0.73, 3.09).263Substance use in pregnancy1.64 (0.86, 3.14).135Hepatitis C co-infection1.64 (0.83, 3.22).151CD4 <350 cells/mm^3^ at delivery1.68 (0.92, 3.09).093Protease inhibitors based antiretroviral therapy1.03 (0.57, 1.87).915Number included in analysis: 456 patients.
Discussion
Our 25-year cohort of PLWH in British Columbia has a preterm birth rate of 19.2% compared to the baseline preterm birth rate in the province of 7.4%.^ 17 ^ Eleven percent of pregnant PLWH were diagnosed with STIBV antenatally, and those with an antenatal diagnosis of STIBV were at higher risk of preterm births. It is particularly striking that although the rates are low in our population, individuals with trichomoniasis in pregnancy had a preterm birth rate of 50%. After adjusting for ethnicity, history of preterm birth, substance use, and HIV suppression, STIBV remains an independent risk factor for preterm birth.
The prevalence of antenatal sexually transmitted infections in our British Columbia cohort is lower compared to other populations living with HIV. In contrast, the US-based Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study established higher rates of sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy: CT (7.7%), NG (2.3%), TV (14.5%) and syphilis (2.4%).^ 5 ^ Despite our consistently lower rates compared to the United States, our cohort’s prevalence remains higher than that of the general Canadian pregnant population. The only published Canadian study estimated CT and NG prevalence in the general pregnant population at 2.0% and 0.2%, respectively.^ 18 ^ The incidence of positive prenatal syphilis testing is 0.03% in British Columbia.^ 19 ^ No Canadian studies have evaluated TV prevalence or incidence in pregnancy. Given the higher incidence of infections in PLWH compared to the general population, our study reinforces the importance of comprehensive sexually transmitted and bloodborne infection screening in pregnancy in this population.
Global preterm birth rates for PLWH range between 5.2% and 73.0%,^ 11 ^ while the preterm birth rate in our study is 19.2%. More importantly, our cohort’s preterm birth rate is much higher than the provincial rate of 7.4%.^ 17 ^ Only two other studies of PLWH have examined the correlation between sexually transmitted infections and preterm labour with conflicting results.^4,5^ The US-based Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study did not find a difference between CT, NG, and TV diagnoses and preterm births.^ 5 ^ Conversely, the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1043 trial identified that PLWH with a diagnosis of CT and NG have a higher preterm birth rate of 29%, compared to their cohort baseline of 11%.^ 4 ^ However, this sub-study recruited PLWH at delivery, completed intrapartum testing for CT/NG and excluded PLWH < 32 weeks gestational age. Our higher rates of preterm birth likely reflect capturing preterm deliveries before 32 weeks gestational age and the impact of antenatal diagnosis. Given the significant overlap between STIBV and social determinants of health, our study uniquely demonstrates that STIBV remains an independent risk factor after adjusting for ethnicity, substance use, CD4 count, Hepatitis C co-infections, antiretroviral therapy regimens, viral suppression, and preterm birth history.
PLWH are at increased risk of bacterial vaginosis acquisition,^ 20 ^ and its prevalence reaches up to 47%, depending on the region and population.^ 21 ^ Only 7.3% of pregnant PLWH in our population were identified with bacterial vaginosis. Currently, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada does not recommend routine screening for BV in pregnancy for asymptomatic individuals without risk factors for preterm birth.^ 22 ^ Testing is only recommended for pregnant people with symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Given this, our low rate reflects the incidence of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis for pregnant PLWH. However, our study highlights that when clinically indicated swabs are completed, people living with HIV with a positive finding of BV are at higher risk of preterm births.
The 25-year duration of our provincial surveillance program is both a strength and a limitation for our study. While our analysis provides a comprehensive perspective of our cohort of PLWH in British Columbia, clinical care has evolved significantly over the years. Diagnostic testing for sexually transmitted infections has improved over the years with increased implementation of nucleic acid amplification testing across our province. Additionally, our infection and bacterial vaginosis cases reflect individuals with positive test results but do not identify the proportion of individuals not screened during pregnancy. As such, we expect the actual rate of concurrent infections to be higher than our reported rate. This is particularly true for conditions not included in the routine prenatal screening, such as trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis. Our study is also underpowered to detect whether treatment of STIBV reduces preterm delivery. In a cohort study like ours, individuals who receive treatment during pregnancy may represent individuals with better access to healthcare, which can also impact preterm delivery rates. British Columbia is also currently struggling with a concurrent substance use epidemic, which is reflected in our cohort’s demographics. The syndemic of HIV and substance use impacts prenatal care and contributes to our high preterm delivery rate of 19.2%. Despite our attempts to adjust through the multivariate analysis, the prevalence of substance use and associated social determinants of health may not reflect the global population of pregnant PLWH, which may limit the external validity of our results.
In conclusion, our analysis demonstrates that pregnant PLWH have high rates of concurrent sexually transmitted and bloodborne infections, as well as bacterial vaginosis. While PLWH are already at increased risk of preterm births, those who have been identified with STIBV in pregnancy are at even greater risk. Due to high concurrent rates of infections and bacterial vaginosis, this study reinforces the need for comprehensive screening in pregnancy for people living with HIV.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Vallely LM Egli-Gany D Wand H , et al. Adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes associated with Neisseria gonorrhoeae: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97(2): 104–111. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2020-054653.33436505 PMC 7892372 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Gao R Liu B Yang W , et al. Association of maternal sexually transmitted infections with risk of preterm birth in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4(11): e 2133413. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33413.34842927 PMC 8630565 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Ahmadi A Ramazanzadeh R Sayehmiri K , et al. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis infections with preterm delivery; a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18(1): 240. DOI: 10.1186/s 12884-018-1868-0.29914397 PMC 6006861 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Adachi K Klausner JD Xu J , et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in HIV-infected pregnant women and adverse infant outcomes. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016; 35(8): 894–900. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001199.27164464 PMC 4945428 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Young MR Broadwell C Kacanek D , et al. Sexually transmitted infections in pregnant people with human immunodeficiency virus: temporal trends, demographic correlates, and association with preterm birth. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75(12): 2211–2218. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac 321.35486952 PMC 10200300 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Liu B Roberts CL Clarke M , et al. Chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections and the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89(8): 672–678. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051118.24005255 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Olson-Chen C Balaram K Hackney DN . Chlamydia trachomatis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of patients with and without infection. Matern Child Health J 2018; 22(6): 812–821. DOI: 10.1007/s 10995-018-2451-z.29417367 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Heumann CL Quilter LAS Eastment MC , et al. Adverse birth outcomes and maternal Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection: a population-based cohort study in Washington state. Sex Transm Dis 2017; 44(5): 266–271. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000592.28407641 PMC 5407319 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
