One-Year Comparative Evaluation of Highly Aspherical Lenslets and Horizontally Asymmetric Peripheral Defocus Lenses for Myopia Control in School-Aged Children
Ivana Orešković, Maja Malenica Ravlić, Lana Knežević, Blanka Doko Mandić, Goran Marić, Ante Vukojević, Mia Zorić Geber, Zoran Vatavuk, Ivan Sabol, Jelena Škunca Herman

TL;DR
This study compared three types of lenses for controlling myopia in children over one year and found that highly aspherical lenslets were most effective in slowing eye length growth.
Contribution
The study provides new evidence that highly aspherical lenslets may be more effective than other lens designs in slowing myopia progression in children.
Findings
HAL lenses showed the smallest median change in spherical equivalent refraction compared to other lens types.
Axial elongation was significantly lower in the HAL group compared to HAPD and SVL groups.
HAPD lenses showed no advantages over standard single vision lenses in controlling myopia progression.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the one-year efficacy of three spectacle lens designs, highly aspherical lenslets (HALs), horizontally asymmetric peripheral defocus (HAPD) lenses, and standard single vision lenses (SVLs) in slowing myopia progression in school-aged children. Methods: In this prospective, non-randomized study, 57 children, aged 8–17 years, were grouped based on the type of lenses worn: HAL (n = 16), HAPD (n = 21), or SVL (n = 20). Comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations were performed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Outcome measures included spherical equivalent refraction (SER), spherical refraction (SR), cylindrical refraction (CR), and axial length (AL). Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: All groups showed some progression in SER and AL over 12 months. The HAL group demonstrated the smallest…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Corneal surgery and disorders · Ocular Infections and Treatments
