Advances in Genetic Risk Scores for Alzheimer’s Disease and Dementia: A Systematic Review

TL;DR

This paper reviews recent advances in using genetic risk scores to predict Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, highlighting new methods and their potential for improving prediction accuracy.

Contribution

The paper systematically categorizes and evaluates different types of genetic risk scores for dementia, emphasizing novel integrative approaches.

Findings

Twenty studies were analyzed, grouped into polygenic, pathway-specific, and complex genetic risk scores.

Combining polygenic risk scores with biological pathways improves dementia prediction accuracy.

New genetic risk scores offer better understanding of dementia's genetic basis.

Abstract

Background: Research concerning the genetic risk for dementia has recently been headed towards new directions. Novel findings from genome-wide association studies have highlighted the association of Alzheimer’s disease incidence with many gene polymorphisms, apart from the Apolipoprotein-E genotype. The identification of additional genetic risk factors has led to the construction of specific genetic risk scores for dementia, considering many different genetic factors and specific biological pathways related to Alzheimer’s disease. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis method, summarizing existing data regarding genetic risk scores for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia, in order to improve the current understanding of the genetic underpinnings of dementia. In specific, five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane Central) were searched using the keywords “genetic risk score”, “Alzheimer’s disease”, and “dementia” with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: From the 552 articles identified, we finally included 20 studies for the qualitative analysis. These reports were classified in three different categories of genetic scores: “polygenic risk scores (PRSs)” (including 11 studies), “pathway specific polygenic risk scores (p-PRSs)” (5 studies), and “complex genetic risk scores” (4 studies). Conclusions: Existing genetic risk scores have contributed to better dementia prediction and a better understanding of the underlying pathology. Novel approaches integrating multiple polygenic risk scores might ameliorate the accuracy of genetic risk scores. The combination of polygenic risk scores that are specific to related biological pathways or relevant biomarkers is of utmost importance to achieve a better predictive ability.

Figures