# Mobilizing for Health: A Case Study of Kazakhstan’s Vaping Ban Advocacy Campaign

**Authors:** Jamilya Sadykova, Akerke Ayaganova, Kuanysh A. Yergaliyev

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22071102 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2025-07-13

## TL;DR

This paper examines a successful campaign in Kazakhstan to ban vaping, highlighting how public health advocacy overcame industry opposition to protect youth.

## Contribution

The study provides a detailed case analysis of a vaping ban advocacy campaign in Kazakhstan, offering insights for other countries facing similar challenges.

## Key findings

- The campaign successfully led to a national vaping ban in Kazakhstan by 2024.
- Public engagement and coalition-building were key to overcoming political and industry resistance.
- The Power Prism framework revealed strategic advocacy efforts that influenced national health policy.

## Abstract

This article focuses on an advocacy campaign for a complete ban on vaping in Kazakhstan led by the Smokefree Kazakhstan Coalition. Initiated in 2021, the campaign aimed to address the growing public health concerns about vaping among adolescents, which was reflected in a sharp increase in vape use among young people—from 1.6% in 2014 to 5.8% in 2022. Despite facing strong opposition from the vaping industry and political lobbyists, the Coalition gained support from key political figures, public health leaders, and NGOs. Over 32 months, the campaign achieved several key milestones, including the inclusion of criminal liabilities for those involved in the vaping industry, and, in 2024, it eventually joined a number of countries such as Thailand, Qatar, Japan, Singapore, and India in approving a vaping ban. The advocacy efforts relied on public engagement, social media, and coordinated civil society mobilization—including petitions, public meetings, awareness campaigns, and coalition-building among NGOs and health advocacy groups—to overcome industry resistance toward official vaping market ban approvals. This article uses the case study approach with the Power Prism framework to describe and evaluate the advocacy campaign’s strategic plan, its political challenges, and the significant impact of public health advocacy in shaping national health policy. The significance of the article lies in the success of the vaping ban in the Kazakhstani context, which may serve as a model for other countries facing similar public health issues, political instability, and industry resistance.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** criminal liabilities (MESH:C536965), respiratory illness (MESH:D012140), deaths (MESH:D003643), nicotine addiction (MESH:D014029), injury to (MESH:D014947), Weight Loss (MESH:D015431), EVALI (MESH:D055370), Crisis (MESH:D001752), cardiovascular disease (MESH:D002318)
- **Chemicals:** VEA (MESH:D024502), ketene (MESH:C008223), HTPs (-), nicotine (MESH:D009538), THC (MESH:D013759)
- **Species:** Nicotiana tabacum (American tobacco, species) [taxon 4097], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12294346/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12294346/full.md

## References

47 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12294346/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12294346