# Formative Development and Acceptability of a Lifestyle Weight Management Intervention for Breast Cancer Survivors in Greece: The NutriLife Study

**Authors:** Maria Perperidi, Eleni Skeparnakou, Dimitra Strongylou, Ariadni Leptopoulou, Thomas Tsiampalis, Konstantinos Tsapakidis, Emmanouil Saloustros, Yannis Theodorakis, Odysseas Androutsos

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13141683 · 2025-07-12

## TL;DR

The NutriLife study developed and tested a lifestyle weight management program for Greek breast cancer survivors, finding it acceptable and ready for further testing.

## Contribution

A co-designed, evidence-based lifestyle intervention for breast cancer survivors with overweight/obesity, tailored for the Greek context.

## Key findings

- The intervention was deemed acceptable across all TFA constructs by stakeholders.
- Potential barriers included limited time, low digital literacy, and lack of commitment.
- Gradual goal-setting and educational resources were seen as beneficial for engagement.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Weight gain is frequently observed during and following breast cancer therapy. Women with overweight/obesity have poorer breast cancer prognoses and are more likely to develop comorbidities. The present study describes the development and qualitative assessment of the acceptability of the NutriLife study, a lifestyle weight management intervention with dietetic counseling and digital tools for breast cancer survivors (BCSs). Methods: The intervention was developed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, informed by a systematic literature review and stakeholder input. Acceptability was assessed using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). A total of 22 BCSs with overweight/obesity participated in focus groups, and 5 dietitians/nutritionists specializing in breast cancer in Greece participated in semi-structured interviews. The data were further analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Stakeholders assessed the intervention as acceptable across all TFA constructs. The intervention was characterized as supportive, easily adaptable, time-efficient, well-organized, beneficial, and professionally driven, with potential barriers including limited personal time, inadequate digital literacy, insufficient self-care, and lack of commitment. Gradually increasing goals may be helpful and less stressful, while educational resources enhance focus on these objectives, thus encouraging intervention participation. Ensuring confidentiality was perceived as central to promoting health. Conclusions: The evidence-based, co-participatory design of the NutriLife intervention was perceived as acceptable by the participating stakeholders and will be pilot-tested in a randomized controlled trial.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MONDO:0004989)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Weight gain (MESH:D015430), Breast Cancer (MESH:D001943), overweight (MESH:D050177), obesity (MESH:D009765)
- **Chemicals:** NutriLife (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12294187/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12294187