# Effects of Oral Appliance Therapy with a Mouth Shield in Periodontitis Patients Who Snore: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

## TL;DR

A mouth shield used with an oral appliance reduces snoring and improves periodontal health in patients with mild to moderate periodontitis.

## Contribution

This study is the first to evaluate the combined use of oral appliance therapy and a mouth shield as an adjunct to standard periodontal treatment in snoring patients.

## Key findings

- OAT+ significantly reduced snoring, mouth breathing, and obstructive sleep events.
- P. gingivalis levels decreased significantly in periodontal pockets.
- Combined therapy showed similar results to OAT+ alone with no negative effects.

## Abstract

Background: Periodontitis is linked to sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including snoring, with 50–75% of cases involving mouth breathing (MB). Standard treatment includes scaling and root planing (SRP). Oral appliance therapy (OAT) is used to treat snoring and SDB. OAT plus a mouth shield (OAT+) worn during sleep may reduce MB to enhance periodontal health. This study evaluated whether OAT+, as an adjunct to SRP, improves periodontal health by reducing periodontal pathogens and facilitating upper airway patency. Methods: Fourteen participants with mild–moderate periodontitis were randomized to receive SRP on one side of the mouth at baseline (T0). Pocket depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI) were recorded, and bacterial DNA from periodontal pockets were analyzed via PCR at baseline (T0) and 12 weeks (T3). At 4 weeks (T1), all participants received a self-titrated myTAP® OA, followed by a mouth shield at 8 weeks (T2). Sleep metrics, including respiratory disturbance index (RDI), were recorded using the NOX T3 at T0–T3. Results: BOP and deep PD levels exhibited slight improvements from the baseline for both SRP and non-SRP (OAT+ only) treated sites but did not achieve significance. BOP decreased significantly more from the baseline in the SRP than in the non-SRP group at T3 (p = 0.028); P. gingivalis’ presence declined on both sides (p = 0.0135). Other periodontal and bacterial parameters showed no significant differences between or within groups. Snoring (p = 0.011), MB (p = 0.025), and RDI (p = 0.019) significantly decreased with OAT+ at T3. Conclusions: In mild–moderate periodontitis patients who snore, OAT+ reduces snoring, MB, and obstructive events, serving as an adjunct to SRP with no negative clinical effects over the short term. The combined therapy yielded similar results to OAT+ alone, likely due to minimization of MB. Its capacity to improve the oral environment is worthy of further investigation.